mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014266.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "160",
    "document_number": "763",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 160 of 197 2701 LCHCmax5\n1 the second address, it had not been disclosed to the government. So we're now having a Friday afternoon, at the conclusion of the defense case, mini trial about properties in London, when all of this could have been anticipated long ago.\n2\n3 I think what defense counsel has said about mixing up addresses is, it's very telling because, it appears to be that their explanation for Ms. Maxwell's deposition testimony is that she mixed up two properties, and that shows that extremely marginal relevance, if any, of impeachment value for Kate's testimony because there doesn't appear to be any dispute that Ms. Maxwell was living in that area of London during the relevant time and defense counsel can't have it both ways. They can't say Ms. Maxwell easily confused two properties.\n4\n5 THE COURT: Sure they can. Everybody does that.\n6 MS. MOE: My point, your Honor, is the relevance. If the view is it's easy to mix up two houses, what's the relevance of going down this rabbit hole of two different properties in London and records at this late stage, especially given the late disclosure to the government and our inability to look into this or respond to it. It's such a sideshow at such a late hour. This could have been teed up much earlier.\n7 MR. EVERDELL: I don't know how this could have been considered a sideshow. This shows that what the witness testified to was a factual impossibility.\n8 THE COURT: Just like Ms. Maxwell's testimony that she SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014266",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 160 of 197 2701 LCHCmax5",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "the second address, it had not been disclosed to the government. So we're now having a Friday afternoon, at the conclusion of the defense case, mini trial about properties in London, when all of this could have been anticipated long ago. I think what defense counsel has said about mixing up addresses is, it's very telling because, it appears to be that their explanation for Ms. Maxwell's deposition testimony is that she mixed up two properties, and that shows that extremely marginal relevance, if any, of impeachment value for Kate's testimony because there doesn't appear to be any dispute that Ms. Maxwell was living in that area of London during the relevant time and defense counsel can't have it both ways. They can't say Ms. Maxwell easily confused two properties.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: Sure they can. Everybody does that. MS. MOE: My point, your Honor, is the relevance. If the view is it's easy to mix up two houses, what's the relevance of going down this rabbit hole of two different properties in London and records at this late stage, especially given the late disclosure to the government and our inability to look into this or respond to it. It's such a sideshow at such a late hour. This could have been teed up much earlier. MR. EVERDELL: I don't know how this could have been considered a sideshow. This shows that what the witness testified to was a factual impossibility. THE COURT: Just like Ms. Maxwell's testimony that she",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014266",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Kate",
      "Ms. Moe",
      "Mr. Everdell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "London"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "763",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014266"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the text."
}