| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "39",
- "document_number": "1-2",
- "date": "07/08/2022",
- "document_type": "Court Document",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page39 of 91\n\n| 05/14/2021 | 280 | JOINT LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated May 14, 2021 re: 277 Order to Continue - Interest of Justice, Terminate Motions, Set Deadlines/ Hearings,.................... re: Extension of time . Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 05/14/2021) |\n| 05/14/2021 | 281 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) on 280 JOINT LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated May 14, 2021. ENDORSEMENT: The request for an extension of time until May 21, 2021 to respond to the Court's May 11, 2021 Order is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 5/14/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 05/14/2021) |\n| 05/14/2021 | 282 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On April 29, 2021, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell wrote to the Court requesting that the Court address her sleeping conditions, with particular emphasis on counsel's representation, unsupported by affidavit or other factual showing, that guards are shining a flashlight in Maxwell's eyes every 15 minutes at night. Dkt. No. 256. Defense counsel claims that the flashlight surveillance in Maxwell's eyes is disrupting her sleep, which in turn is impacting her ability to prepare for and withstand trial. The Court sought more information by ordering the Government to confer with legal counsel for the Bureau of Prisons and to respond to certain questions. Dkt. No. 257. In response, the Government states that MDC staff conduct flashlight checks of all inmates as a matter of course. Dkt. No. 270. As reported by the Government, inmates housed with cell mates in the Special Housing Unit are checked with flashlights every 30 minutes. Inmates housed with others in the general population are checked multiple times per night at regular intervals. The Government further reports that to conduct the checks, flashlights are pointed at the ceiling of the cell to confirm that the inmate is present, breathing and not in distress. As the Government explains, there are a number of neutral reasons why BOP's flashlight checks of Maxwell are relatively more frequent than those of other inmates, including that Maxwell is housed alone, the nature of the charges, and the potential stress for inmates that can arise in high-profile cases. The MDC has determined that these factors necessitate more frequent safety and security checks. The Government also indicates that the prohibition on eye masks is a generally applicable policy, but that Maxwell, like other inmates, may use other noncontraband items to cover her eyes. To the extent that Maxwell's April 29, 2021 letter asks the Court to override BOP's determination as to the frequency of appropriate safety and security check procedures, that request is denied as factually unsubstantiated and legally unsupported. Certainly nothing in the record plausibly establishes that current protocols interfere with Maxwell's ability to prepare for her trial and communicate with her lawyers. Defense counsel's May 7, 2021 letter, Dkt. No. 272, describes generalized grievances but makes no additional specific and supported application for relief. Nevertheless, the Court urges the MDC to consider whether sleep disruption for pretrial detainees can be reduced. The Court also admonishes the MDC and the Government to continue to ensure that Maxwell is subjected to only those security protocols that BOP determines are necessary for her safety and security, based upon neutral and applicable factors, and consistent with the treatment of similarly situated pre-trial detainees. The Government shall provide a copy of this Order to the Warden and General Counsel for the MDC. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 5/14/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 05/14/2021) |\n| 05/14/2021 | 283 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated May 14, 2021 re: Proposed Redactions to Defendant's Letter re BSF Subpoena Document filed by USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 05/14/2021) |\n| 05/17/2021 | 284 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 278 Letter Proposed Redactions to Defendant's Supplemental Pre-Trial Motions... ENDORSEMENT: The Court grants in part the Government's redaction and sealing requests. Its conclusion is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The Court concludes that these are judicial documents and that the First Amendment and common law presumptions of access attach. Id. at 11920. In balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, the Court finds that the arguments the Government has put forward in this letter, including the need to protect the privacy interests of third parties and alleged victims, favor the narrowly tailored redactions. See United States v. DOJ-OGR-00020425",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page39 of 91",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "The table contains court documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case, including motions, endorsements, orders, and letters.",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020425",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Ghislaine Maxwell",
- "Alison J. Nathan",
- "Maurene Comey",
- "Alison Moe",
- "Lara Pomerantz",
- "Andrew Rohrbach"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "USA",
- "MDC",
- "BOP",
- "Bureau of Prisons",
- "Second Circuit"
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "05/14/2021",
- "05/17/2021",
- "07/08/2022",
- "April 29, 2021",
- "May 7, 2021",
- "May 11, 2021",
- "May 14, 2021",
- "May 21, 2021"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "22-1426",
- "1-2",
- "3344417",
- "277",
- "280",
- "281",
- "282",
- "283",
- "284",
- "278",
- "256",
- "257",
- "270",
- "272",
- "435 F.3d 110",
- "DOJ-OGR-00020425"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case. The text is mostly printed, with some possible redactions. The document includes a table with various court documents, including motions, endorsements, orders, and letters."
- }
|