DOJ-OGR-00020459.json 5.9 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "73",
  4. "document_number": "22-1426, Document 1-2",
  5. "date": "07/08/2022",
  6. "document_type": "Court Document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page73 of 91\n\n(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/12/2021)\n12/12/2021 540 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C. Sternheim dated 12/12/2021 re: Order of Defense Witnesses (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 12/12/2021)\n12/13/2021 541 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated December 13, 2021 re: Privilege stipulation Document filed by USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/13/2021)\n12/14/2021 542 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Defense's letter dated December 13, 2021, regarding anticipated witnesses. The Government is ORDERED to submit a response no later than today, December 14, 2021, at 10:00 p.m. The Defense is FURTHER ORDERED to provide a copy of its anticipated witness order to the Court no later than today, December 14, 2021, at 12:00 p.m. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/14/2021)(bw) (Entered: 12/14/2021)\n12/14/2021 543 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (jus) (Entered: 12/14/2021)\n12/14/2021 544 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated December 13, 2021 re: Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards and Robert Glassman (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 (Filed Under Seal))(Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/15/2021)\n12/15/2021 545 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated December 14, 2021 re: Testimony from Victim Counsel Document filed by USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/15/2021)\n12/15/2021 546 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated December 15, 2021 re: Proposed redactions to Privilege Letters. Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/15/2021)\n12/15/2021 547 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C. Sternheim dated 12/15/2021 re: Opposition to restriction on expert testimony (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 12/15/2021)\n12/15/2021 548 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Defense on December 12, 2021, moved to permit three anticipated witnesses to testify under a pseudonym or their first names only. The Government filed a letter opposing this request on December 14, 2021. The Defense's primary contention is that some form of anonymity for its witnesses is justified by the same reasons that the Court permitted three alleged victims and two related government witnesses to testify under pseudonyms. The Court disagrees with this basic premise and denies the Defense's motion....[*** See this Memorandum Opinion & Order ***]... Last, the Court emphasizes that while it currently denies the Defense's motion, the Defense may of course raise, and the Court will consider, objections that particular lines of questioning into witnesses' backgrounds or lives are irrelevant, cumulative, intended to harass, or otherwise inappropriate. See, e.g., Smith v. Illinois, 390 U.S. 129, 133 (1968) (emphasizing that even when anonymity is not warranted, the court has a duty to protect a witness \"from questions which go beyond the bounds of proper cross-examination merely to harass, annoy or humiliate him\"). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/15/2021)(bw) (Entered: 12/16/2021)\n12/15/2021 694 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Government's motion to preclude certain testimony of defense witnesses, dated December 15, 2021. The Defense is ORDERED to submit a response as follows: - A response to the motion with respect to Dr. Loftus by today, December 15, 2021, at 7:45 p.m. - A response to the motion with respect to Alexander Hamilton by tomorrow, December 16, 2021, at 7:00 a.m. - A response to the motion with respect to the other anticipated witnesses by tomorrow, December 16, 2021, at 5:00 p.m. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/15/2021)(bw) (Entered: 06/29/2022)\n12/16/2021 551 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of the parties' joint letter regarding the admission of prior inconsistent statements. The parties' letter notes \"that\n\nDOJ-OGR-00020459",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page73 of 91",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "The table contains various court documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case, including letters, orders, and memoranda.",
  20. "position": "middle"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020459",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. }
  27. ],
  28. "entities": {
  29. "people": [
  30. "Ghislaine Maxwell",
  31. "Alison J. Nathan",
  32. "Bobbi C. Sternheim",
  33. "Maurene Comey",
  34. "Alison Moe",
  35. "Lara Pomerantz",
  36. "Andrew Rohrbach",
  37. "Jeffrey S. Pagliuca",
  38. "Jack Scarola",
  39. "Brad Edwards",
  40. "Robert Glassman",
  41. "Dr. Loftus",
  42. "Alexander Hamilton"
  43. ],
  44. "organizations": [
  45. "USA"
  46. ],
  47. "locations": [],
  48. "dates": [
  49. "12/12/2021",
  50. "12/13/2021",
  51. "12/14/2021",
  52. "12/15/2021",
  53. "12/16/2021",
  54. "07/08/2022",
  55. "06/29/2022"
  56. ],
  57. "reference_numbers": [
  58. "22-1426",
  59. "Document 1-2",
  60. "3344417",
  61. "DOJ-OGR-00020459"
  62. ]
  63. },
  64. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case. The entries include letters, orders, and memoranda from both the defense and prosecution. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
  65. }