DOJ-OGR-00020532.json 12 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "46",
  4. "document_number": "3-2",
  5. "date": "07/08/2022",
  6. "document_type": "Court Document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page46 of 92\n\n| 08/23/2021 | 325 | ORDER re: 324 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated August 20, 2021 re: Limited unsealing. Defense counsel is ORDERED to provide this Order and the temporarily sealed Opinion and Order to the intended recipients of the subpoenas. By August 25, 2021, defense counsel is ORDERED to confirm service of this Order and the temporarily sealed Opinion and Order. The Court GRANTS the Governments request for a limited unsealing of the Court's August 13 Opinion and Order and the underlying motion papers. Dkt. No. 324. The Court will send the temporarily sealed Opinion and Order and motion papers to the Government. This resolves Dkt. No. 324. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 8/23/21) (jw) (Entered: 08/23/2021)\n| 08/23/2021 | | Transmission to Sealed Records Clerk: as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Transmitted re: 325 Order on Letter Motion to the Sealed Records Clerk for the sealing or unsealing of document or case. (jw) (Entered: 08/23/2021)\n| 08/23/2021 | 326 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated August 23, 2021 re: Response to Defense August 18, 2021 Letter Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 08/23/2021)\n| 08/24/2021 | 327 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C. Sternheim dated 08/24/2021 (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 08/24/2021)\n| 08/25/2021 | 328 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated August 25, 2021 re: Service of Order. (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 08/25/2021)\n| 08/25/2021 | 329 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Defendant submitted a letter on August 18 informing the Court about disruptions of attorney-client video teleconferences. Dkt. No. 319. After conferring with MDC Legal, the Government responded on August 23. Dkt. No. 326. According to the Government and MDC Legal, the Defendant's difficulties in communicating with her counsel via video teleconference have been resolved, and the Government's letter sufficiently addresses her other requests. The Court finds MDC Legal's assurance that Defendant's communications have not been interfered with, recorded, or listened to sufficient. No further application for relief was made in Defendant's August 24 reply. Dkt. No. 327. The Court remains confident that Ms. Maxwell is fully able to communicate with her defense counsel and to prepare for trial. If Defendant experiences further issues in communicating with her counsel, she should promptly notify the Court after conferring in good faith with the Government and MDC Legal. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 8/25/21)(jw) (Entered: 08/25/2021)\n| 08/27/2021 | 330 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Clerk's Office has now confirmed that a jury trial in this case has been scheduled to commence on November 29, 2021. This is a firm trial date. When the information is available, the Court will provide courtroom location and public access information by separate order. In light of the firm dates discussed above, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties appear for a telephone conference to discuss jury selection matters on October 21, 2021 at 12:00 P.M. Dial-in information for the parties and for public access will be provided when it is available by separate order. In light of the jury selection dates provided by the Clerks Office, the Court amends theschedule that it set on June 2, 2021 as follows. The parties shall meet and confer and submit a joint proposed juror questionnaire and joint proposed voir dire by October 11, 2021. The parties shall file a joint proposed charge and verdict sheet, with any differing proposals supported by authority or other justification, by October 27, 2021. Any motions in limine must be simultaneously filed by October 18, 2021, and any responses to motions in limine are due by October 25, 2021. Otherwise, the parties shall continue to follow the schedule that the Court set on June 2, 2021. Dkt. No. 297. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties appear for an in-person pretrial conference on November 1, 2021 at 11:00 A.M. (Pretrial Conference set for 11/1/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Alison J. Nathan., Telephone Conference set for 10/21/2021 at 12:00 PM before Judge Alison J. Nathan.). (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 8/27/21)(jw) (Entered: 08/27/2021)\n| 08/30/2021 | 331 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated August 30, 2021 re: Response to Government Letter dated August 18, 2021, Dkt. 320 (Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/30/2021)\n\nDOJ-OGR-00020532",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page46 of 92",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "| 08/23/2021 | 325 | ORDER re: 324 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated August 20, 2021 re: Limited unsealing. Defense counsel is ORDERED to provide this Order and the temporarily sealed Opinion and Order to the intended recipients of the subpoenas. By August 25, 2021, defense counsel is ORDERED to confirm service of this Order and the temporarily sealed Opinion and Order. The Court GRANTS the Governments request for a limited unsealing of the Court's August 13 Opinion and Order and the underlying motion papers. Dkt. No. 324. The Court will send the temporarily sealed Opinion and Order and motion papers to the Government. This resolves Dkt. No. 324. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 8/23/21) (jw) (Entered: 08/23/2021)",
  20. "position": "body"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "| 08/23/2021 | | Transmission to Sealed Records Clerk: as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Transmitted re: 325 Order on Letter Motion to the Sealed Records Clerk for the sealing or unsealing of document or case. (jw) (Entered: 08/23/2021)",
  25. "position": "body"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "| 08/23/2021 | 326 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated August 23, 2021 re: Response to Defense August 18, 2021 Letter Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 08/23/2021)",
  30. "position": "body"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "| 08/24/2021 | 327 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C. Sternheim dated 08/24/2021 (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 08/24/2021)",
  35. "position": "body"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "| 08/25/2021 | 328 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated August 25, 2021 re: Service of Order. (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 08/25/2021)",
  40. "position": "body"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "| 08/25/2021 | 329 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Defendant submitted a letter on August 18 informing the Court about disruptions of attorney-client video teleconferences. Dkt. No. 319. After conferring with MDC Legal, the Government responded on August 23. Dkt. No. 326. According to the Government and MDC Legal, the Defendant's difficulties in communicating with her counsel via video teleconference have been resolved, and the Government's letter sufficiently addresses her other requests. The Court finds MDC Legal's assurance that Defendant's communications have not been interfered with, recorded, or listened to sufficient. No further application for relief was made in Defendant's August 24 reply. Dkt. No. 327. The Court remains confident that Ms. Maxwell is fully able to communicate with her defense counsel and to prepare for trial. If Defendant experiences further issues in communicating with her counsel, she should promptly notify the Court after conferring in good faith with the Government and MDC Legal. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 8/25/21)(jw) (Entered: 08/25/2021)",
  45. "position": "body"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "| 08/27/2021 | 330 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Clerk's Office has now confirmed that a jury trial in this case has been scheduled to commence on November 29, 2021. This is a firm trial date. When the information is available, the Court will provide courtroom location and public access information by separate order. In light of the firm dates discussed above, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties appear for a telephone conference to discuss jury selection matters on October 21, 2021 at 12:00 P.M. Dial-in information for the parties and for public access will be provided when it is available by separate order. In light of the jury selection dates provided by the Clerks Office, the Court amends theschedule that it set on June 2, 2021 as follows. The parties shall meet and confer and submit a joint proposed juror questionnaire and joint proposed voir dire by October 11, 2021. The parties shall file a joint proposed charge and verdict sheet, with any differing proposals supported by authority or other justification, by October 27, 2021. Any motions in limine must be simultaneously filed by October 18, 2021, and any responses to motions in limine are due by October 25, 2021. Otherwise, the parties shall continue to follow the schedule that the Court set on June 2, 2021. Dkt. No. 297. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties appear for an in-person pretrial conference on November 1, 2021 at 11:00 A.M. (Pretrial Conference set for 11/1/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Alison J. Nathan., Telephone Conference set for 10/21/2021 at 12:00 PM before Judge Alison J. Nathan.). (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 8/27/21)(jw) (Entered: 08/27/2021)",
  50. "position": "body"
  51. },
  52. {
  53. "type": "printed",
  54. "content": "| 08/30/2021 | 331 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated August 30, 2021 re: Response to Government Letter dated August 18, 2021, Dkt. 320 (Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/30/2021)",
  55. "position": "body"
  56. },
  57. {
  58. "type": "printed",
  59. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020532",
  60. "position": "footer"
  61. }
  62. ],
  63. "entities": {
  64. "people": [
  65. "Ghislaine Maxwell",
  66. "Alison J. Nathan",
  67. "Maurene Comey",
  68. "Alison Moe",
  69. "Lara Pomerantz",
  70. "Andrew Rohrbach",
  71. "Bobbi C. Sternheim",
  72. "Christian R. Everdell",
  73. "Jeffrey S. Pagliuca"
  74. ],
  75. "organizations": [
  76. "USA",
  77. "MDC Legal",
  78. "Clerk's Office"
  79. ],
  80. "locations": [],
  81. "dates": [
  82. "08/23/2021",
  83. "08/20/2021",
  84. "08/25/2021",
  85. "08/13/2021",
  86. "08/18/2021",
  87. "08/24/2021",
  88. "08/27/2021",
  89. "08/30/2021",
  90. "11/29/2021",
  91. "10/21/2021",
  92. "06/02/2021",
  93. "10/11/2021",
  94. "10/27/2021",
  95. "10/18/2021",
  96. "10/25/2021",
  97. "11/01/2021",
  98. "07/08/2022"
  99. ],
  100. "reference_numbers": [
  101. "22-1426",
  102. "3-2",
  103. "3344434",
  104. "324",
  105. "325",
  106. "326",
  107. "327",
  108. "328",
  109. "329",
  110. "330",
  111. "331",
  112. "319",
  113. "320",
  114. "297",
  115. "DOJ-OGR-00020532"
  116. ]
  117. },
  118. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries include orders, letters, and other documents filed by the parties and the court. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
  119. }