mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021553.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "123",
    "document_number": "78",
    "date": "06/29/2023",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page123 of 217\nSA-377\n8\n1    admitted at trial showed that accounts under Epstein's name\n2    wired approximately $23 million over two occasions during the\n3    conspiracy to accounts of \"Ghislaine Maxwell.\"  The defendant's\n4    assertion that Epstein's accountant may have had access to and\n5    control over these accounts does not undermine the reasonable\n6    inference that the defendant controlled the funds in accounts\n7    bearing her name, so that is established by a preponderance.\n8    As to the third objection that there's no evidence in\n9    the record that Epstein bought the defendant her New York City\n10   townhouse, I overrule that objection because I credit Kate's\n11   testimony that the defendant told her that Epstein bought the\n12   defendant her New York townhouse.\n13   Paragraph 25 is an objection to the characterization\n14   of the Palm Beach residence being operated through a culture of\n15   silence.\n16   You'll let me know if you're not maintaining an\n17   objection.\n18   MR. EVERDELL: Yes.  I think that the default is we\n19   are, your Honor.\n20   THE COURT: Understood.\n21   I overrule this objection.  Evidence at trial\n22   indicates that this was the case.  For example, the household\n23   manual instructed employees to \"see nothing, hear nothing, say\n24   nothing.\"  I credit Mr. Alessi's testimony that he understood\n25   this instruction to be a kind of warning that he was supposed\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C...(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00021553",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page123 of 217",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SA-377",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1    admitted at trial showed that accounts under Epstein's name\n2    wired approximately $23 million over two occasions during the\n3    conspiracy to accounts of \"Ghislaine Maxwell.\"  The defendant's\n4    assertion that Epstein's accountant may have had access to and\n5    control over these accounts does not undermine the reasonable\n6    inference that the defendant controlled the funds in accounts\n7    bearing her name, so that is established by a preponderance.\n8    As to the third objection that there's no evidence in\n9    the record that Epstein bought the defendant her New York City\n10   townhouse, I overrule that objection because I credit Kate's\n11   testimony that the defendant told her that Epstein bought the\n12   defendant her New York townhouse.\n13   Paragraph 25 is an objection to the characterization\n14   of the Palm Beach residence being operated through a culture of\n15   silence.\n16   You'll let me know if you're not maintaining an\n17   objection.\n18   MR. EVERDELL: Yes.  I think that the default is we\n19   are, your Honor.\n20   THE COURT: Understood.\n21   I overrule this objection.  Evidence at trial\n22   indicates that this was the case.  For example, the household\n23   manual instructed employees to \"see nothing, hear nothing, say\n24   nothing.\"  I credit Mr. Alessi's testimony that he understood\n25   this instruction to be a kind of warning that he was supposed",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C...(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021553",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Epstein",
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Kate",
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "Mr. Alessi"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York City",
      "Palm Beach"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "06/29/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 78",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021553"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the text."
}