mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021576.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "146",
    "document_number": "78",
    "date": "06/29/2023",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page146 of 217\nSA-400\nM6SQmax1 31\n1 very clear that when you have two knowing conspirators, Maxwell\n2 and Epstein, and they bring in a much younger woman as an\n3 assistant and have her take on some of those roles while the\n4 defendant remains a lady of the house in the hierarchy of the\n5 structure to whom a person like Sarah Kellen would report, that\n6 she has leadership of that person; that she is directing that\n7 person; that she has control. Even the simple task of\n8 directing her to take on some of those responsibilities, which,\n9 of course, to transition parts of that role she would have to\n10 do would qualify for leadership.\n11 THE COURT: And there's clear time overlap in the\n12 role?\n13 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. As we noted in our brief,\n14 the flight records reflect that the defendant continued flying\n15 on Epstein's private jet at the same time that Sarah Kellen was\n16 also traveling, and that there was an overlap in the years of\n17 the time period where they were all close associates of Jeffrey\n18 Epstein and the scheme was ongoing.\n19 THE COURT: Go ahead.\n20 MR. EVERDELL: Yes. Your Honor, before I address the\n21 Sarah Kellen point, I would just make the point that the\n22 government seems to argue that there is some case law that is\n23 not clear that you don't have to necessarily show that they're\n24 supervising another criminal participant. That's just wrong.\n25 All those cases that the government cites, the issue has\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C... (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00021576",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page146 of 217",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SA-400",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "M6SQmax1 31\n1 very clear that when you have two knowing conspirators, Maxwell\n2 and Epstein, and they bring in a much younger woman as an\n3 assistant and have her take on some of those roles while the\n4 defendant remains a lady of the house in the hierarchy of the\n5 structure to whom a person like Sarah Kellen would report, that\n6 she has leadership of that person; that she is directing that\n7 person; that she has control. Even the simple task of\n8 directing her to take on some of those responsibilities, which,\n9 of course, to transition parts of that role she would have to\n10 do would qualify for leadership.\n11 THE COURT: And there's clear time overlap in the\n12 role?\n13 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. As we noted in our brief,\n14 the flight records reflect that the defendant continued flying\n15 on Epstein's private jet at the same time that Sarah Kellen was\n16 also traveling, and that there was an overlap in the years of\n17 the time period where they were all close associates of Jeffrey\n18 Epstein and the scheme was ongoing.\n19 THE COURT: Go ahead.\n20 MR. EVERDELL: Yes. Your Honor, before I address the\n21 Sarah Kellen point, I would just make the point that the\n22 government seems to argue that there is some case law that is\n23 not clear that you don't have to necessarily show that they're\n24 supervising another criminal participant. That's just wrong.\n25 All those cases that the government cites, the issue has",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C... (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021576",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Maxwell",
      "Epstein",
      "Sarah Kellen",
      "Jeffrey Epstein",
      "MS. MOE",
      "MR. EVERDELL"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "06/29/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 78",
      "3536039",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021576"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}