| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "3",
- "document_number": "87",
- "date": "07/27/2023",
- "document_type": "Court Document",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 87, 07/27/2023, 3548202, Page3 of 35\nC. The District Court Abused Its Discretion in Imposing Unreasonable Limitations on the Range of Questions it Agreed to Pose to Juror 50 at the Post-Verdict Hearing....................19\nD. Juror 50's Actual, Implied, and Inferable Bias Was Established..............................................22\nPOINT III\n(Point V in Appellant's Principal Brief)\nTHE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN SENTENCING MS. MAXWELL.......................................................26\nCONCLUSION....................................................................................27\nii\nDOJ-OGR-00021745",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 87, 07/27/2023, 3548202, Page3 of 35",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "C. The District Court Abused Its Discretion in Imposing Unreasonable Limitations on the Range of Questions it Agreed to Pose to Juror 50 at the Post-Verdict Hearing....................19\nD. Juror 50's Actual, Implied, and Inferable Bias Was Established..............................................22\nPOINT III\n(Point V in Appellant's Principal Brief)\nTHE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN SENTENCING MS. MAXWELL.......................................................26\nCONCLUSION....................................................................................27",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "ii",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021745",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "MS. MAXWELL"
- ],
- "organizations": [],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "07/27/2023"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "22-1426",
- "87",
- "3548202",
- "DOJ-OGR-00021745"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of MS. MAXWELL. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is well-formatted and legible."
- }
|