| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "1",
- "document_number": "114",
- "date": "09/17/2024",
- "document_type": "Judgment",
- "has_handwriting": true,
- "has_stamps": true
- },
- "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 114, 09/17/2024, 3634126, Page1 of 1\n\nUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\nFOR THE\nSECOND CIRCUIT\n\nAt a Stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 17th day of September, two thousand twenty-four,\n\nBefore: José A. Cabranes,\nRichard C. Wesley,\nRaymond J. Lohier, Jr.,\nCircuit Judges.\n\nUnited States of America,\nAppellee,\n\nJUDGMENT\n\nv.\nDocket No. 22-1426\n\nGhislaine Maxwell, AKA Sealed Defendant 1,\nDefendant - Appellant.\n\nThe appeal in the above captioned case from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York was argued on the district court's record and the parties' briefs. Upon consideration thereof,\n\nIT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the district court's June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction is AFFIRMED.\n\nFor the Court:\nCatherine O'Hagan Wolfe,\nClerk of Court\n\nCatherine O'Hagan Wolfe\nDOJ-OGR-00021824",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 114, 09/17/2024, 3634126, Page1 of 1",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\nFOR THE\nSECOND CIRCUIT",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "At a Stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 17th day of September, two thousand twenty-four,",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Before: José A. Cabranes,\nRichard C. Wesley,\nRaymond J. Lohier, Jr.,\nCircuit Judges.",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "United States of America,\nAppellee,\nv.\nGhislaine Maxwell, AKA Sealed Defendant 1,\nDefendant - Appellant.",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "JUDGMENT\nDocket No. 22-1426",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "The appeal in the above captioned case from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York was argued on the district court's record and the parties' briefs. Upon consideration thereof,",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the district court's June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction is AFFIRMED.",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "For the Court:\nCatherine O'Hagan Wolfe,\nClerk of Court",
- "position": "bottom"
- },
- {
- "type": "handwritten",
- "content": "Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe",
- "position": "bottom"
- },
- {
- "type": "stamp",
- "content": "UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT",
- "position": "bottom"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021824",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "José A. Cabranes",
- "Richard C. Wesley",
- "Raymond J. Lohier, Jr.",
- "Ghislaine Maxwell",
- "Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit",
- "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York"
- ],
- "locations": [
- "New York",
- "Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse",
- "40 Foley Square"
- ],
- "dates": [
- "September 17, 2024",
- "June 29, 2022"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "22-1426",
- "114",
- "3634126",
- "DOJ-OGR-00021824"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document is a judgment from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It appears to be a standard court document with printed text and a signature from the Clerk of Court. There is a stamp from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The document is in good condition with no visible damage or redactions."
- }
|