mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021826.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2 of 51",
    "document_number": "117",
    "date": "11/01/2024",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 117, 11/01/2024, 3636586, Page2 of 51\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\nPage\nTABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................................... ii\nINTRODUCTION AND RULE 35(B)(1) STATEMENT ............................... 1\nISSUE PRESENTED ............................................................... 3\nBACKGROUND ................................................................... 3\nPANEL DECISION ................................................................ 5\nARGUMENT ........................................................................ 7\nEN BANC REVIEW IS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE WHETHER ANABI'S CANON OF CONSTRUCTION FOR PLEA AGREEMENTS SHOULD BE OVERRULED OR LIMITED ....................... 7\nCONCLUSION ..................................................................... 16\ni\nDOJ-OGR-00021826",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 117, 11/01/2024, 3636586, Page2 of 51",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Page\nTABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................................... ii\nINTRODUCTION AND RULE 35(B)(1) STATEMENT ............................... 1\nISSUE PRESENTED ............................................................... 3\nBACKGROUND ................................................................... 3\nPANEL DECISION ................................................................ 5\nARGUMENT ........................................................................ 7\nEN BANC REVIEW IS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE WHETHER ANABI'S CANON OF CONSTRUCTION FOR PLEA AGREEMENTS SHOULD BE OVERRULED OR LIMITED ....................... 7\nCONCLUSION ..................................................................... 16",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "i",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021826",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/01/2024"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "22-1426",
      "117",
      "3636586",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021826"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a table of contents. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
}