mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00022070.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "8",
    "document_number": "35",
    "date": "04/24/20",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT Document 35 Filed 04/24/20 Page 8 of 34\n\nBoth defendants are charged in Counts One, Four, Five, and Six; defendant Noel only is charged in Counts Two and Three. The charges in the Indictment stem from a fourteen-hour time period, from approximately 4:00 p.m. on August 9, 2019 to approximately 6:30 a.m. the following day, August 10, 2019, when the defendants were working as correctional officers at the MCC. As charged in the Indictment, during that time period, the defendants failed to perform mandated counts of prisoners housed in MCC's Special Housing Unit (\"SHU\"), but nevertheless signed false certifications attesting to having conducted those counts, when, in fact, no counts or rounds of the SHU were conducted from approximately 10:30 p.m. on August 9 to 6:30 a.m. on August 10.\n\nII. Pretrial Discovery and the Defendants' Request for Additional Materials\n\nA. The Government's Discovery Production\n\nAt the initial pretrial conference on November 25, 2019, the Court set a discovery deadline of December 31, 2019. On that date, pursuant to a protective order entered by the Court, the Government made a substantial discovery production to both defendants, consisting in part of the following: surveillance video for the common area of the SHU; analysis of the computers used by Noel and Thomas from August 9 to 10, 2019; count slips and thirty-minute round reports; MCC phone records; personnel records and prior work schedules; and reports and notes of witness interviews prepared by agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (\"FBI\") and the DOJ-OIG who were participating in the investigation.2\n\nSubsequently, the Government made three additional discovery productions, much more limited in scope. On January 23, 2020, the Government produced additional interview reports and\n\n2 The Government does not concede that production of all of the materials was required under Rule 16, but nonetheless produced the materials in its possession out of an abundance of caution.\n\n3\n\nDOJ-OGR-00022070",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT Document 35 Filed 04/24/20 Page 8 of 34",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Both defendants are charged in Counts One, Four, Five, and Six; defendant Noel only is charged in Counts Two and Three. The charges in the Indictment stem from a fourteen-hour time period, from approximately 4:00 p.m. on August 9, 2019 to approximately 6:30 a.m. the following day, August 10, 2019, when the defendants were working as correctional officers at the MCC. As charged in the Indictment, during that time period, the defendants failed to perform mandated counts of prisoners housed in MCC's Special Housing Unit (\"SHU\"), but nevertheless signed false certifications attesting to having conducted those counts, when, in fact, no counts or rounds of the SHU were conducted from approximately 10:30 p.m. on August 9 to 6:30 a.m. on August 10.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "II. Pretrial Discovery and the Defendants' Request for Additional Materials",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A. The Government's Discovery Production",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "At the initial pretrial conference on November 25, 2019, the Court set a discovery deadline of December 31, 2019. On that date, pursuant to a protective order entered by the Court, the Government made a substantial discovery production to both defendants, consisting in part of the following: surveillance video for the common area of the SHU; analysis of the computers used by Noel and Thomas from August 9 to 10, 2019; count slips and thirty-minute round reports; MCC phone records; personnel records and prior work schedules; and reports and notes of witness interviews prepared by agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (\"FBI\") and the DOJ-OIG who were participating in the investigation.2",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Subsequently, the Government made three additional discovery productions, much more limited in scope. On January 23, 2020, the Government produced additional interview reports and",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2 The Government does not concede that production of all of the materials was required under Rule 16, but nonetheless produced the materials in its possession out of an abundance of caution.",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "3",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00022070",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Noel",
      "Thomas"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "MCC",
      "FBI",
      "DOJ-OIG"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "August 9, 2019",
      "August 10, 2019",
      "November 25, 2019",
      "December 31, 2019",
      "January 23, 2020",
      "04/24/20"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00830-AT",
      "Document 35",
      "DOJ-OGR-00022070"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The text is mostly printed, with a few footnotes. There are no visible stamps or handwritten annotations."
}