| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "2382",
- "document_number": "DOJ-OGR-00026059",
- "date": "2019/10/22",
- "document_type": "email chain",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Re: Re: Media inquiry - due 3 pm - USA Today - re: monitoring video of\nFrom Hugh Hurwitz\nTo \nDate 2019/10/22 13:33\nSubject: Re: Re: Media inquiry - due 3 pm - USA Today - re: monitoring video of\nAttachments: TEXT.htm\nThanks. Let know, since this came from usa today, I'm guessing he found out from .\nHugh\nSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone\n------- Original message -------\nFrom @bop.gov>\nDate: 10/22/19 1:30 PM (GMT-05:00)\nTo: @bop.gov>, Hugh Hurwitz @bop.gov>\nSubject: Fwd: Re: Media inquiry - due 3 pm - USA Today - re: monitoring video of\n10/22/2019 13:30\nFYI\n10/22/2019 1:27 PM\nThanks to Hugh for clarifying this. Upon reflection, I agree it really is probably only about the CPD rounds issue.\nI'm walking down to CPD now to see if they can improve my new draft answer below.\nPublic Information Office\nFederal Bureau of Prisons\n(202) 353-\n10/22/2019 1:24 PM\nI'm walking down to CPD to see if I can find someone in your absence who can review my new, very rough draft answer below, which AD Hurwitz says is best answered by CPD and not RSD. Accordingly, I eliminated my prior (long) draft answer that had input from RSD.\nThanks,",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Re: Re: Media inquiry - due 3 pm - USA Today - re: monitoring video of\nFrom Hugh Hurwitz\nTo \nDate 2019/10/22 13:33\nSubject: Re: Re: Media inquiry - due 3 pm - USA Today - re: monitoring video of\nAttachments: TEXT.htm",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Thanks. Let know, since this came from usa today, I'm guessing he found out from .\nHugh\nSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "------- Original message -------\nFrom @bop.gov>\nDate: 10/22/19 1:30 PM (GMT-05:00)\nTo: @bop.gov>, Hugh Hurwitz @bop.gov>\nSubject: Fwd: Re: Media inquiry - due 3 pm - USA Today - re: monitoring video of",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "10/22/2019 13:30\nFYI\n10/22/2019 1:27 PM\nThanks to Hugh for clarifying this. Upon reflection, I agree it really is probably only about the CPD rounds issue.\nI'm walking down to CPD now to see if they can improve my new draft answer below.",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Public Information Office\nFederal Bureau of Prisons\n(202) 353-",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "10/22/2019 1:24 PM\nI'm walking down to CPD to see if I can find someone in your absence who can review my new, very rough draft answer below, which AD Hurwitz says is best answered by CPD and not RSD. Accordingly, I eliminated my prior (long) draft answer that had input from RSD.\nThanks,",
- "position": "bottom"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Hugh Hurwitz"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "USA Today",
- "Federal Bureau of Prisons",
- "Verizon",
- "Samsung"
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "2019/10/22",
- "10/22/19",
- "10/22/2019"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "DOJ-OGR-00026059"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document is an email chain with redactions. The redactions are marked with '(b)(6); (b)(7)(C)' and '(b)(5)'. The email chain discusses a media inquiry from USA Today regarding monitoring video."
- }
|