mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00014835.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "88",
    "document_number": "779",
    "date": "08/22/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 779 Filed 08/22/22 Page 88 of 101 88 M6s2Max2\n1 THE COURT: Thank you for your patience.\n2 As I have stated, the guideline range applicable to\n3 this case is 188 to 235 months' imprisonment.\n4 Under the Supreme Court's decision in a case called\n5 Booker and related cases, the guideline range is only one\n6 factor that the Court must consider in deciding the appropriate\n7 sentence. I am also required to consider the other factors set\n8 forth in a provision called 18 U.S.C. 3553(a). These include\n9 the nature and circumstances of the offense, and the history\n10 and characteristics of the defendant; the need for the sentence\n11 imposed to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote\n12 respect for the law, to provide just punishment for the\n13 offense, to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct, to\n14 protect the public from further crimes of the defendant, to\n15 provide needed educational, vocational training, medical care,\n16 or other treatment. I am to take into account the kinds of\n17 sentences available, as I have said, the guideline range, any\n18 pertinent policy statement, the need to avoid unwarranted\n19 sentence disparities among defendants with similar records who\n20 have been found guilty of similar conduct, the need to provide\n21 restitution as appropriate under the law to any victims of the\n22 offense.\n23 I am required to impose a sentence sufficient, but no\n24 greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes I have just\n25 described. I have given substantial thought and attention to\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014835",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 779 Filed 08/22/22 Page 88 of 101 88 M6s2Max2",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: Thank you for your patience. As I have stated, the guideline range applicable to this case is 188 to 235 months' imprisonment. Under the Supreme Court's decision in a case called Booker and related cases, the guideline range is only one factor that the Court must consider in deciding the appropriate sentence. I am also required to consider the other factors set forth in a provision called 18 U.S.C. 3553(a). These include the nature and circumstances of the offense, and the history and characteristics of the defendant; the need for the sentence imposed to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, to provide just punishment for the offense, to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct, to protect the public from further crimes of the defendant, to provide needed educational, vocational training, medical care, or other treatment. I am to take into account the kinds of sentences available, as I have said, the guideline range, any pertinent policy statement, the need to avoid unwarranted sentence disparities among defendants with similar records who have been found guilty of similar conduct, the need to provide restitution as appropriate under the law to any victims of the offense. I am required to impose a sentence sufficient, but no greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes I have just described. I have given substantial thought and attention to",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014835",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "Supreme Court",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/22/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "779",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014835",
      "18 U.S.C. 3553(a)"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}