mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00014876.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "26",
    "document_number": "20-cr-00330",
    "date": "June 29, 2022",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 20-cr-00330-PAE Document 178 Filed 12/02/22 Page 26 of 26\n1. The District Court did not err in holding that Epstein's NPA with USAO-SDFL did not bar Maxwell's prosecution by USAO-SDNY.\n2. The District Court did not err in holding that the Indictment was filed within the statute of limitations.\n3. The District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Maxwell's Rule 33 motion for a new trial.\n4. The District Court's response to a jury note did not result in a constructive amendment of, or prejudicial variance from, the allegations in the Indictment.\n5. The District Court's sentence was procedurally reasonable.\nFor the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the District Court's June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction.\n26\nDOJ-OGR-00014876",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 20-cr-00330-PAE Document 178 Filed 12/02/22 Page 26 of 26",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1. The District Court did not err in holding that Epstein's NPA with USAO-SDFL did not bar Maxwell's prosecution by USAO-SDNY.\n2. The District Court did not err in holding that the Indictment was filed within the statute of limitations.\n3. The District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Maxwell's Rule 33 motion for a new trial.\n4. The District Court's response to a jury note did not result in a constructive amendment of, or prejudicial variance from, the allegations in the Indictment.\n5. The District Court's sentence was procedurally reasonable.\nFor the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the District Court's June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "26",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014876",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Epstein",
      "Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "USAO-SDFL",
      "USAO-SDNY",
      "District Court"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "SDNY",
      "SDFL"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "June 29, 2022",
      "12/02/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "20-cr-00330",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014876"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court ruling or judgment, with a formal tone and language. The text is well-formatted and easy to read. There are no visible redactions or damages."
}