| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "56",
- "document_number": "782",
- "date": "01/15/25",
- "document_type": "Court Transcript",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 56 of 158 56\nLBAGmax2 Rocchio - Direct\n1 can get consistency. And it's a concept that is frequently\n2 referred to in forensic studies.\n3 Q. Do more recent articles respond to some of the concerns\n4 raised by this Bennett and O'Donohue article?\n5 A. They do.\n6 Q. Can you please explain?\n7 A. The article we looked at earlier by Winters attempted\n8 specifically to address some concerns. So she attempted to\n9 validate the grooming model. And she very specifically wanted\n10 to see, okay, of course there's not going to be universal\n11 agreement on every single behavior, but she did a statistical\n12 study to find out specifically what behaviors do the\n13 professionals and the experts agree upon. And again,\n14 remembering that all of the behaviors -- even the ones that, in\n15 that particular study, didn't meet the statistical significance\n16 in that study, all of those behaviors were behaviors that have\n17 been commonly referred to and described in the literature.\n18 Q. Dr. Rocchio, how do error rates factor into this\n19 literature?\n20 A. So I think when we talk about error rates within the field\n21 of psychology, the kind of gold standard is when you have a\n22 particular technique or a drug and you ideally would randomly\n23 assign people, one who receives the drug, one who doesn't\n24 receive the drug, and I would kind of compare whether -- how\n25 effective it is. For obvious reasons, you can't assign some\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014932",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 56 of 158 56",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "LBAGmax2 Rocchio - Direct",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "1 can get consistency. And it's a concept that is frequently\n2 referred to in forensic studies.\n3 Q. Do more recent articles respond to some of the concerns\n4 raised by this Bennett and O'Donohue article?\n5 A. They do.\n6 Q. Can you please explain?\n7 A. The article we looked at earlier by Winters attempted\n8 specifically to address some concerns. So she attempted to\n9 validate the grooming model. And she very specifically wanted\n10 to see, okay, of course there's not going to be universal\n11 agreement on every single behavior, but she did a statistical\n12 study to find out specifically what behaviors do the\n13 professionals and the experts agree upon. And again,\n14 remembering that all of the behaviors -- even the ones that, in\n15 that particular study, didn't meet the statistical significance\n16 in that study, all of those behaviors were behaviors that have\n17 been commonly referred to and described in the literature.\n18 Q. Dr. Rocchio, how do error rates factor into this\n19 literature?\n20 A. So I think when we talk about error rates within the field\n21 of psychology, the kind of gold standard is when you have a\n22 particular technique or a drug and you ideally would randomly\n23 assign people, one who receives the drug, one who doesn't\n24 receive the drug, and I would kind of compare whether -- how\n25 effective it is. For obvious reasons, you can't assign some",
- "position": "main"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014932",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Bennett",
- "O'Donohue",
- "Winters",
- "Rocchio"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "01/15/25"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "782",
- "DOJ-OGR-00014932"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|