mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016477.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "261",
    "document_number": "759",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 261 of 267 2289 LCAVMAX8\n\n1 Our concern is that the jury might feel we don't want\n2 to come back and would rush to judgment in a case that we know\n3 they were prepared to be here until the middle of January. And\n4 they are already getting some time off. They may be\n5 disinclined to want to come back. And that could inure to the\n6 disadvantage of both parties, I understand.\n7\n8 But I think we would not want to be in a position\n9 where the jury basically had one day prior to Christmas\n10 holiday, and I would ask the Court to be mindful of that, as I\n11 am sure you are. And that was one of the reasons why early on\n12 when we were hopeful that we could begin this case earlier\n13 because of our concern that it was going to bump up, now\n14 clearly we are way ahead of what the schedule is. But I would\n15 ask the Court to take into consideration that concern that we\n16 have.\n17 THE COURT: Okay. Ms. Moe?\n18 MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to the timing of\n19 deliberations, I think the request on the timing of\n20 deliberations is, I think, at best, premature because we don't\n21 know how long the defense case will be; and so I don't think\n22 the Court needs to reach that now.\n23 But as a preview, if we end up in a situation in which\n24 the defense rests during the week of the 20th, I think we\n25 should be respectful of the jury's time. There's no reason for\n26 the jury not to be permitted to deliberate. I think it would\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00016477",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 261 of 267 2289 LCAVMAX8",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 Our concern is that the jury might feel we don't want\n2 to come back and would rush to judgment in a case that we know\n3 they were prepared to be here until the middle of January. And\n4 they are already getting some time off. They may be\n5 disinclined to want to come back. And that could inure to the\n6 disadvantage of both parties, I understand.\n7\n8 But I think we would not want to be in a position\n9 where the jury basically had one day prior to Christmas\n10 holiday, and I would ask the Court to be mindful of that, as I\n11 am sure you are. And that was one of the reasons why early on\n12 when we were hopeful that we could begin this case earlier\n13 because of our concern that it was going to bump up, now\n14 clearly we are way ahead of what the schedule is. But I would\n15 ask the Court to take into consideration that concern that we\n16 have.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "17 THE COURT: Okay. Ms. Moe?\n18 MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to the timing of\n19 deliberations, I think the request on the timing of\n20 deliberations is, I think, at best, premature because we don't\n21 know how long the defense case will be; and so I don't think\n22 the Court needs to reach that now.\n23 But as a preview, if we end up in a situation in which\n24 the defense rests during the week of the 20th, I think we\n25 should be respectful of the jury's time. There's no reason for\n26 the jury not to be permitted to deliberate. I think it would",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016477",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Moe"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "the week of the 20th"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "759",
      "DOJ-OGR-00016477"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}