| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "43",
- "document_number": "765",
- "date": "08/10/22",
- "document_type": "court transcript",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 43 of 95 2781 LCI1MAX1 of a minor to engage in, so I think we need to change the titles for Count Four, and I can get you the pages in a second, but \"transportation of an individual under 18 to engage in illegal sexual activity.\" MR. ROHRBACH: That's fine, your Honor, but this actually raises a related question, which is just whether the Court sends the indictment back with the jury, since I think the indictment has the same issue. It describes some of the offenses in their captions as \"of a minor.\" THE COURT: Well, what are the parties' positions on that? MR. ROHRBACH: The government is not seeking to send the indictment back, your Honor. MR. EVERDELL: One moment, your Honor. THE COURT: Yes. MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, the defense would not like that to happen. We think that the instructions advise the jury about what they need to know about the law. THE COURT: You're saying you don't want to send the indictment back. MR. EVERDELL: Right. THE COURT: You're in vigorous agreement. MR. EVERDELL: Oh, I thought we were disagreeing. That's so rare. Yes, we're in agreement with that. THE COURT: I don't send it back unless the parties SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00016969",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 43 of 95 2781 LCI1MAX1",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "of a minor to engage in, so I think we need to change the titles for Count Four, and I can get you the pages in a second, but \"transportation of an individual under 18 to engage in illegal sexual activity.\" MR. ROHRBACH: That's fine, your Honor, but this actually raises a related question, which is just whether the Court sends the indictment back with the jury, since I think the indictment has the same issue. It describes some of the offenses in their captions as \"of a minor.\" THE COURT: Well, what are the parties' positions on that? MR. ROHRBACH: The government is not seeking to send the indictment back, your Honor. MR. EVERDELL: One moment, your Honor. THE COURT: Yes. MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, the defense would not like that to happen. We think that the instructions advise the jury about what they need to know about the law. THE COURT: You're saying you don't want to send the indictment back. MR. EVERDELL: Right. THE COURT: You're in vigorous agreement. MR. EVERDELL: Oh, I thought we were disagreeing. That's so rare. Yes, we're in agreement with that. THE COURT: I don't send it back unless the parties",
- "position": "main content"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016969",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "MR. ROHRBACH",
- "MR. EVERDELL"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "08/10/22"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
- "765",
- "DOJ-OGR-00016969",
- "(212) 805-0300"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|