mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00017286.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "8",
    "document_number": "769",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 769 Filed 08/10/22 Page 8 of 19 3099 LCLVMAXT\n1 MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you.\n2 THE COURT: Actually, counsel are aware of the\n3 identity of the jurors; so I'm comfortable with counsel seeing\n4 the note. And then I'll redact for purposes of public exhibit.\n5 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, the primary reason is so that\n6 we can, as the parties, look at it and analyze it and, when you\n7 come down, be prepared to make the arguments. It has nothing\n8 to do with using it for any other purpose.\n9 THE COURT: No, I understand.\n10 Okay. So do you need these now or do you want --\n11 MS. STERNHEIM: We'd like to have copies.\n12 THE COURT: Of course.\n13 MS. STERNHEIM: But it's not as immediate.\n14 THE COURT: Okay. I will figure out who knows how to\n15 do a redaction.\n16 MS. MENNINGER: We're pretty good at it.\n17 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, it is true that the parties\n18 know the names of the jurors; so if the Court wanted to send an\n19 electronic copy of the note to the parties, the parties could\n20 redact it and then send a redacted version back to the Court.\n21 THE COURT: All right. We'll do that. Thank you.\n22 MS. COMEY: Thank you, your Honor.\n23 (Recess pending verdict)\n24 THE COURT: I have a note.\n25 We would like to end today at 5 p.m., deliberate from\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00017286",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 769 Filed 08/10/22 Page 8 of 19 3099 LCLVMAXT",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00017286",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you.\n2 THE COURT: Actually, counsel are aware of the\n3 identity of the jurors; so I'm comfortable with counsel seeing\n4 the note. And then I'll redact for purposes of public exhibit.\n5 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, the primary reason is so that\n6 we can, as the parties, look at it and analyze it and, when you\n7 come down, be prepared to make the arguments. It has nothing\n8 to do with using it for any other purpose.\n9 THE COURT: No, I understand.\n10 Okay. So do you need these now or do you want --\n11 MS. STERNHEIM: We'd like to have copies.\n12 THE COURT: Of course.\n13 MS. STERNHEIM: But it's not as immediate.\n14 THE COURT: Okay. I will figure out who knows how to\n15 do a redaction.\n16 MS. MENNINGER: We're pretty good at it.\n17 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, it is true that the parties\n18 know the names of the jurors; so if the Court wanted to send an\n19 electronic copy of the note to the parties, the parties could\n20 redact it and then send a redacted version back to the Court.\n21 THE COURT: All right. We'll do that. Thank you.\n22 MS. COMEY: Thank you, your Honor.\n23 (Recess pending verdict)\n24 THE COURT: I have a note.\n25 We would like to end today at 5 p.m., deliberate from",
      "position": "main"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. STERNHEIM",
      "THE COURT",
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "MS. COMEY"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "769",
      "DOJ-OGR-00017286"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}