mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00017664.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "55",
    "document_number": "745",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 55 of 264 461 LC1Qmax2 Jane - Cross government on that date. THE COURT: Your theory is everything that she -- when you ask her, \"What did you say on this date to the government,\" she says, \"I don't remember.\" MS. MENNINGER: Her story has changed like a hundred thousand times, and that is exactly what the problem is here, your Honor. THE COURT: Well, here's the problem: There is a way you can get in her story has changed, but what you're doing and what -- I don't know what the limits to this would be. You're asking her very specific questions about multiple instances of reporting, and when she said \"I don't remember what I said in that moment,\" you're then introducing the statements of what she said. MS. MENNINGER: I can say, isn't it true that you said this? That's the other way to phrase it. THE COURT: You could say \"do you recall saying this to the government\"? If she says no, then you move on. MS. MENNINGER: Right. That's all I've been doing. THE COURT: Is that right? MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. I think we're talking about two different scenarios. The first is, for example, if Ms. Menninger asked the witness, \"Did this meeting happen on a particular date\" or you know \"were you living in the blue house\" for example. If the witness says, \"I don't remember,\" SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 55 of 264 461",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LC1Qmax2 Jane - Cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "government on that date. THE COURT: Your theory is everything that she -- when you ask her, \"What did you say on this date to the government,\" she says, \"I don't remember.\" MS. MENNINGER: Her story has changed like a hundred thousand times, and that is exactly what the problem is here, your Honor. THE COURT: Well, here's the problem: There is a way you can get in her story has changed, but what you're doing and what -- I don't know what the limits to this would be. You're asking her very specific questions about multiple instances of reporting, and when she said \"I don't remember what I said in that moment,\" you're then introducing the statements of what she said. MS. MENNINGER: I can say, isn't it true that you said this? That's the other way to phrase it. THE COURT: You could say \"do you recall saying this to the government\"? If she says no, then you move on. MS. MENNINGER: Right. That's all I've been doing. THE COURT: Is that right? MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. I think we're talking about two different scenarios. The first is, for example, if Ms. Menninger asked the witness, \"Did this meeting happen on a particular date\" or you know \"were you living in the blue house\" for example. If the witness says, \"I don't remember,\"",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Menninger",
      "Ms. Moe"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "745",
      "461",
      "212-805-0300"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}