DOJ-OGR-00018278.json 3.9 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "177",
  4. "document_number": "749",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 177 of 236 1081\nLC3KMAX6 Parkinson - Direct\n1 Special Agent Maguire was going to offer that I don't believe is being objected to.\n2\n3 Never mind, your Honor, I'm being told -- never mind.\n4 THE COURT: All right.\n5 With respect to the items, either the physical items or the photographs of the school costumes, as I indicated - and\n6\n7 I think the ruling I'm making now is fully consistent with that - it has to be tied through a witness as to similarity of items\n8 seen at the time. And that was what I ruled before about those, which is why you can lay the foundation through Maguire,\n9 and if it's temporally tied back, I imagine I would admit it, depending on that testimony; same theory here.\n10\n11 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.\n12 MS. COMEY: Understood, your Honor. Thank you.\n13\n14 THE COURT: All right.\n15\n16 Are these for me or for the witness?\n17 MR. EVERDELL: Those are for you, your Honor.\n18 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you.\n19 MR. EVERDELL: It should be three, for the next three witnesses. Sorry I couldn't get one for your Honor's deputy.\n20\n21 THE COURT: All right. So we can bring the witness back and we can get the jury.\n22\n23 THE WITNESS: Good afternoon, your Honor.\n24 THE COURT: Good afternoon, Mr. Parkinson. You may take your seat. Thank you.\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00018278",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 177 of 236 1081",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "LC3KMAX6 Parkinson - Direct",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "1 Special Agent Maguire was going to offer that I don't believe is being objected to.\n2\n3 Never mind, your Honor, I'm being told -- never mind.\n4 THE COURT: All right.\n5 With respect to the items, either the physical items or the photographs of the school costumes, as I indicated - and\n6\n7 I think the ruling I'm making now is fully consistent with that - it has to be tied through a witness as to similarity of items\n8 seen at the time. And that was what I ruled before about those, which is why you can lay the foundation through Maguire,\n9 and if it's temporally tied back, I imagine I would admit it, depending on that testimony; same theory here.\n10\n11 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.\n12 MS. COMEY: Understood, your Honor. Thank you.\n13\n14 THE COURT: All right.\n15\n16 Are these for me or for the witness?\n17 MR. EVERDELL: Those are for you, your Honor.\n18 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you.\n19 MR. EVERDELL: It should be three, for the next three witnesses. Sorry I couldn't get one for your Honor's deputy.\n20\n21 THE COURT: All right. So we can bring the witness back and we can get the jury.\n22\n23 THE WITNESS: Good afternoon, your Honor.\n24 THE COURT: Good afternoon, Mr. Parkinson. You may take your seat. Thank you.\n25",
  25. "position": "main content"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00018278",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "Maguire",
  41. "EVERDELL",
  42. "COMEY",
  43. "Parkinson"
  44. ],
  45. "organizations": [
  46. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  47. ],
  48. "locations": [],
  49. "dates": [
  50. "08/10/22"
  51. ],
  52. "reference_numbers": [
  53. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  54. "749",
  55. "DOJ-OGR-00018278"
  56. ]
  57. },
  58. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with clear and legible text. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  59. }