DOJ-OGR-00019299.json 2.5 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "13",
  4. "document_number": "17",
  5. "date": "09/10/2020",
  6. "document_type": "court document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 20-3061, Document 17, 09/10/2020, 2928288, Page13 of 15\nmodification of the protective order would destroy the secrecy of the ongoing grand jury investigation. Ex. G, p 3-4.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nIn Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d at 47-48, this Court concluded that the right of access demanded the unsealing of the civil summary judgment material. A fair and consistent application of the decision in Brown supports Ms. Maxwell's request to share with Judge Preska the information she learned from Judge Nathan. There's no reason Judge Preska should be deprived access to material presumptively available to the public.\n12\nDOJ-OGR-00019299",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 20-3061, Document 17, 09/10/2020, 2928288, Page13 of 15",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "modification of the protective order would destroy the secrecy of the ongoing grand jury investigation. Ex. G, p 3-4.",
  20. "position": "top"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "redacted",
  24. "content": "[Multiple redacted lines]",
  25. "position": "middle"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "In Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d at 47-48, this Court concluded that the right of access demanded the unsealing of the civil summary judgment material. A fair and consistent application of the decision in Brown supports Ms. Maxwell's request to share with Judge Preska the information she learned from Judge Nathan. There's no reason Judge Preska should be deprived access to material presumptively available to the public.",
  30. "position": "middle"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "12",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019299",
  40. "position": "footer"
  41. }
  42. ],
  43. "entities": {
  44. "people": [
  45. "Maxwell",
  46. "Judge Preska",
  47. "Judge Nathan",
  48. "Ms. Maxwell"
  49. ],
  50. "organizations": [],
  51. "locations": [],
  52. "dates": [
  53. "09/10/2020"
  54. ],
  55. "reference_numbers": [
  56. "20-3061",
  57. "17",
  58. "2928288",
  59. "929 F.3d",
  60. "DOJ-OGR-00019299"
  61. ]
  62. },
  63. "additional_notes": "The document contains redactions, likely to protect sensitive information related to the grand jury investigation."
  64. }