mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019611.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "4",
    "document_number": "82",
    "date": "10/02/2020",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 20-3061, Document 82, 10/02/2020, 29442677, Page4 of 37\niii\nPAGE\nIn re City of N.Y.,\n607 F.3d 923 (2d Cir. 2010) ................ 20, 21\nIn re S.E.C. ex rel. Glotzer,\n374 F.3d 184 (2d Cir. 2004) .................... 20\nIn re Teligent, Inc.,\n640 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 2011) ..................... 22\nKensington Int'l Ltd. v. Republic of Congo,\n461 F.3d 238 (2d Cir. 2006) ................... 11\nLugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga,\n435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) ................... 14\nMidland Asphalt Corp. v. United States,\n489 U.S. 794 (1989)........................ 10, 13\nMinpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc.,\n832 F.2d 739 (2d Cir. 1987) ................... 13\nMohawk Indus., Inc. v. Carpenter,\n558 U.S. 100 (2009).................... 10, 11, 16, 18\nPichler v. UNITE,\n585 F.3d 741 (3d Cir. 2009) ................... 13\nS.E.C. v. The Street.com,\n273 F.3d 222 (2d Cir. 2001) ................... 22\nSell v. United States,\n539 U.S. 166 (2003)............................ 10\nStack v. Boyle,\n342 U.S. 1 (1951)............................... 10\nUnited States v. Aliotta,\n199 F.3d 78 (2d Cir. 1999) ...................... 9\nDOJ-OGR-00019611",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 20-3061, Document 82, 10/02/2020, 29442677, Page4 of 37",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "iii\nPAGE",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "In re City of N.Y.,\n607 F.3d 923 (2d Cir. 2010) ................ 20, 21\nIn re S.E.C. ex rel. Glotzer,\n374 F.3d 184 (2d Cir. 2004) .................... 20\nIn re Teligent, Inc.,\n640 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 2011) ..................... 22\nKensington Int'l Ltd. v. Republic of Congo,\n461 F.3d 238 (2d Cir. 2006) ................... 11\nLugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga,\n435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) ................... 14\nMidland Asphalt Corp. v. United States,\n489 U.S. 794 (1989)........................ 10, 13\nMinpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc.,\n832 F.2d 739 (2d Cir. 1987) ................... 13\nMohawk Indus., Inc. v. Carpenter,\n558 U.S. 100 (2009).................... 10, 11, 16, 18\nPichler v. UNITE,\n585 F.3d 741 (3d Cir. 2009) ................... 13\nS.E.C. v. The Street.com,\n273 F.3d 222 (2d Cir. 2001) ................... 22\nSell v. United States,\n539 U.S. 166 (2003)............................ 10\nStack v. Boyle,\n342 U.S. 1 (1951)............................... 10\nUnited States v. Aliotta,\n199 F.3d 78 (2d Cir. 1999) ...................... 9",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019611",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Glotzer",
      "Carpenter",
      "Aliotta",
      "Boyle"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "City of N.Y.",
      "S.E.C.",
      "Telligent, Inc.",
      "Kensington Int'l Ltd.",
      "Republic of Congo",
      "Pyramid Co. of Onondaga",
      "Midland Asphalt Corp.",
      "United States",
      "Minpeco S.A.",
      "Conticommodity Servs., Inc.",
      "Mohawk Indus., Inc.",
      "UNITE",
      "The Street.com"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York",
      "Congo",
      "Onondaga"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "2010",
      "2004",
      "2011",
      "2006",
      "1989",
      "1987",
      "2009",
      "2001",
      "2003",
      "1951",
      "1999"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "20-3061",
      "82",
      "29442677",
      "DOJ-OGR-00019611"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court document, likely a brief or memorandum, containing a list of case citations. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes. The document is well-formatted and legible."
}