mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019691.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "4",
    "document_number": "109",
    "date": "11/09/2020",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": true,
    "has_stamps": true
  },
  "full_text": "Case 20-3061, Document 109, 11/09/2020, 2970926, Page4 of 4\n\nappeal concerns an unsealing order. Further, as the District Court correctly noted, Maxwell \"provide[s] no coherent explanation\" connecting the discovery materials at issue in the criminal case to the civil litigation.\n\nCONCLUSION\n\nWe have reviewed all of the arguments raised by Defendant-Appellant Maxwell on appeal and find them to be without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is DISMISSED and the motion to consolidate is DENIED as moot.\n\nAny appeal in this criminal case shall be referred to another panel in the ordinary course.\n\nFOR THE COURT:\nCatherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk\n\nCatherine O'Hagan Wolfe\n\nA True Copy\nCatherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk\nUnited States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit\n\nCatherine O'Hagan Wolfe\n\n4\n\nDOJ-OGR-00019691",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 20-3061, Document 109, 11/09/2020, 2970926, Page4 of 4",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "appeal concerns an unsealing order. Further, as the District Court correctly noted, Maxwell \"provide[s] no coherent explanation\" connecting the discovery materials at issue in the criminal case to the civil litigation.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "CONCLUSION",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "We have reviewed all of the arguments raised by Defendant-Appellant Maxwell on appeal and find them to be without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is DISMISSED and the motion to consolidate is DENIED as moot.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Any appeal in this criminal case shall be referred to another panel in the ordinary course.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "FOR THE COURT:\nCatherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "handwritten",
      "content": "Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "stamp",
      "content": "UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A True Copy\nCatherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk\nUnited States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "handwritten",
      "content": "Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "stamp",
      "content": "UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "4",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019691",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe",
      "Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "United States Court of Appeals",
      "District Court"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/09/2020"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "20-3061",
      "109",
      "2970926",
      "DOJ-OGR-00019691"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a clear conclusion and signature from the clerk, Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe. The document includes stamps and handwritten signatures."
}