mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00020004.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "145",
    "document_number": "39-2",
    "date": "04/01/2021",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 39-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page145 of 200\nk7e2MaxC kjc\n1 quoting there from United States v. Boustani, 932 F.3d 79, (2d\n2 Cir. 2019).\n3 The court concludes as follows:\n4 First, the nature and circumstances of the offense\n5 here weigh in favor of detention. As noted, the crimes\n6 involving minor victims that Ms. Maxwell has been accused of\n7 are serious enough to trigger a statutory presumption in favor\n8 of detention. And to reiterate, Ms. Maxwell is presumed\n9 innocent until proven guilty, but if she were convicted of\n10 these crimes, the sentences she faces is substantial enough to\n11 incentivize her to flee. In total, Ms. Maxwell, who is 58\n12 years old, faces up to a 35-year maximum term of imprisonment\n13 if convicted. And even if sentences are run concurrently, she\n14 would still face up to a decade of incarceration.\n15 Second, noting again that Ms. Maxwell is entitled to\n16 the full presumption of innocence, it is appropriate to\n17 consider the strength of the evidence proffered by the\n18 government in assessing risk of flight. The government's\n19 evidence at this early juncture of the case appears strong.\n20 Although the charged conduct took place many years ago, the\n21 indictment describes multiple victims who provided detailed\n22 accounts of Ms. Maxwell's involvement in serious crimes. The\n23 government also proffers that this witness testimony will be\n24 corroborated by significant contemporaneous documentary\n25 evidence. While the defense states that it intends to assert\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00020004",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 21-58, Document 39-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page145 of 200",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "k7e2MaxC kjc\n1 quoting there from United States v. Boustani, 932 F.3d 79, (2d\n2 Cir. 2019).\n3 The court concludes as follows:\n4 First, the nature and circumstances of the offense\n5 here weigh in favor of detention. As noted, the crimes\n6 involving minor victims that Ms. Maxwell has been accused of\n7 are serious enough to trigger a statutory presumption in favor\n8 of detention. And to reiterate, Ms. Maxwell is presumed\n9 innocent until proven guilty, but if she were convicted of\n10 these crimes, the sentences she faces is substantial enough to\n11 incentivize her to flee. In total, Ms. Maxwell, who is 58\n12 years old, faces up to a 35-year maximum term of imprisonment\n13 if convicted. And even if sentences are run concurrently, she\n14 would still face up to a decade of incarceration.\n15 Second, noting again that Ms. Maxwell is entitled to\n16 the full presumption of innocence, it is appropriate to\n17 consider the strength of the evidence proffered by the\n18 government in assessing risk of flight. The government's\n19 evidence at this early juncture of the case appears strong.\n20 Although the charged conduct took place many years ago, the\n21 indictment describes multiple victims who provided detailed\n22 accounts of Ms. Maxwell's involvement in serious crimes. The\n23 government also proffers that this witness testimony will be\n24 corroborated by significant contemporaneous documentary\n25 evidence. While the defense states that it intends to assert",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020004",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "04/01/2021"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 21-58",
      "Document 39-2",
      "3068530",
      "DOJ-OGR-00020004"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to the case of Ms. Maxwell. The text is printed and clear, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document includes a header with case information and a footer with the name of the reporting company and a reference number."
}