mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021551.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "121",
    "document_number": "78",
    "date": "06/29/2023",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page121 of 217\nSA-375\n\nM6SQmax1\n1 presentence report?\n2 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n3 THE COURT: Thank you.\n4 So we will turn first -- we'll set aside first the guideline calculation. We'll turn to the factual accuracy of the report. And I did receive substantial factual objections to factual assertions in the report. I am prepared to go through those with respect to any continuing factual objections by the defense.\n5 Let me confirm, Ms. Moe, does the government have any objections to the report regarding factual accuracy?\n6 MS. MOE: None, aside from those which are already noted in the PSR.\n7 THE COURT: No continuing objections.\n8 MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor.\n9 THE COURT: Mr. Everdell, I know that you do have continuing objections. Tell me where you'd like to begin.\n10 MR. EVERDELL: Well, your Honor, I don't know if the Court is planning on resolving each and every factual discrepancy or dispute or whether there are certain ones that the court will find are relevant to sentencing or whether we should go through each in detail.\n11 THE COURT: I am prepared to -- what I typically do is go through each one so that if there is a correction to the report that is being requested to be made, whether it's\n12 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C... (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00021551",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page121 of 217",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SA-375",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "M6SQmax1\n1 presentence report?\n2 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n3 THE COURT: Thank you.\n4 So we will turn first -- we'll set aside first the guideline calculation. We'll turn to the factual accuracy of the report. And I did receive substantial factual objections to factual assertions in the report. I am prepared to go through those with respect to any continuing factual objections by the defense.\n5 Let me confirm, Ms. Moe, does the government have any objections to the report regarding factual accuracy?\n6 MS. MOE: None, aside from those which are already noted in the PSR.\n7 THE COURT: No continuing objections.\n8 MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor.\n9 THE COURT: Mr. Everdell, I know that you do have continuing objections. Tell me where you'd like to begin.\n10 MR. EVERDELL: Well, your Honor, I don't know if the Court is planning on resolving each and every factual discrepancy or dispute or whether there are certain ones that the court will find are relevant to sentencing or whether we should go through each in detail.\n11 THE COURT: I am prepared to -- what I typically do is go through each one so that if there is a correction to the report that is being requested to be made, whether it's",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C... (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021551",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Moe",
      "Mr. Everdell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "06/29/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 78",
      "3536039",
      "SA-375",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021551"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}