mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007156.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "105",
    "document_number": "465",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 105 of 127 105 LB15max4\n\nTHE COURT: So to the extent there is overlap in these issues, it's best to take it up in the 412 proceeding so that we can discuss the issues without violating that rule.\n\nDefendant's 13. This is a motion to preclude the admission of several exhibits. I'm going to grant the motion with respect to Exhibit 251 and 288. Based on the briefing before me, 401 relevance is minimal, at best, and outweighed by 403 prejudice. 294, so some of the same questions around the authentication issue so I think that ruling holds. I won't otherwise preclude this evidence. It is potentially corroborative evidence of testimony and 403 prejudice does not rule out 401 but the defense can maintain the search and authentication issues that we have discussed.\n\nExhibit 403 I won't preclude, it's potentially probative of the relationship between the defendant and Mr. Epstein. The government proffers that it will corroborate and that the photo would corroborate anticipated witness testimony and I don't -- so, there is 401 relevance and not substantially outweighed by any 403 prejudice.\n\nOn this last one I may have said the wrong number. I had 403 on mine. So, Exhibit 313 is the photograph that I have indicated I am not excluding, it is potentially probative of the relationship between the defendant and Mr. Epstein and not outweighed by prejudice.\n\nAnd then 606, this is the issue on authentication and\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00007156",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 105 of 127 105 LB15max4",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: So to the extent there is overlap in these issues, it's best to take it up in the 412 proceeding so that we can discuss the issues without violating that rule.\n\nDefendant's 13. This is a motion to preclude the admission of several exhibits. I'm going to grant the motion with respect to Exhibit 251 and 288. Based on the briefing before me, 401 relevance is minimal, at best, and outweighed by 403 prejudice. 294, so some of the same questions around the authentication issue so I think that ruling holds. I won't otherwise preclude this evidence. It is potentially corroborative evidence of testimony and 403 prejudice does not rule out 401 but the defense can maintain the search and authentication issues that we have discussed.\n\nExhibit 403 I won't preclude, it's potentially probative of the relationship between the defendant and Mr. Epstein. The government proffers that it will corroborate and that the photo would corroborate anticipated witness testimony and I don't -- so, there is 401 relevance and not substantially outweighed by any 403 prejudice.\n\nOn this last one I may have said the wrong number. I had 403 on mine. So, Exhibit 313 is the photograph that I have indicated I am not excluding, it is potentially probative of the relationship between the defendant and Mr. Epstein and not outweighed by prejudice.\n\nAnd then 606, this is the issue on authentication and",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007156",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/15/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "465",
      "251",
      "288",
      "294",
      "401",
      "403",
      "313",
      "606",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007156"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}