DOJ-OGR-00004903.json 4.6 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "10",
  4. "document_number": "311-1",
  5. "date": "07/02/21",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 311-1 Filed 07/02/21 Page 10 of 23\n\nXj3q1gra\n\nSEALED\n\n1 It hasn't done any of those things. So under Martindell, the\n2 government lacks standing, because remember, in Martindell, the\n3 government only had standing because all the parties were\n4 familiar with the government's application. It wasn't a\n5 secret. I don't know why it wasn't a secret, but it wasn't a\n6 secret. And nobody objected. And so they said, ah, okay,\n7 objection to standing waived.\n8 So, you know, once again, Judge Sweet, I can tell you,\n9 was somewhat troubled by the procedural posture of the case\n10 even though, as I understand it, he was perhaps partly to blame\n11 for the procedural posture of the case, but it's not like Boies\n12 Schiller came in here and asked for relief from the protective\n13 order. And I am curious about why Boies Schiller didn't do\n14 that.\n15 MR. ROSSMILLER: Your Honor, what I can tell you about\n16 that is we, the government, thought that we were in a position\n17 to make the application via the All Writs Act submission that\n18 we originally made, that that would be an appropriate vehicle\n19 for the relief that we, as the government, were seeking in\n20 connection with the protective order. So I'm not sure --\n21 THE COURT: You're seeking to have a third party, to\n22 have Boies Schiller, who were counsel for the plaintiffs in the\n23 Maxwell action, be relieved from the protective order, but if\n24 there's anybody on this planet who is capable of asking,\n25 \"Please relieve us from the strictures of this protective\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300 SDNY_GM_00000861\nDOJ-OGR-00004903",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 311-1 Filed 07/02/21 Page 10 of 23",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "Xj3q1gra\n\nSEALED",
  20. "position": "top"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "1 It hasn't done any of those things. So under Martindell, the\ngovernment lacks standing, because remember, in Martindell, the\ngovernment only had standing because all the parties were\nfamiliar with the government's application. It wasn't a\nsecret. I don't know why it wasn't a secret, but it wasn't a\nsecret. And nobody objected. And so they said, ah, okay,\nobjection to standing waived.\n\nSo, you know, once again, Judge Sweet, I can tell you,\nwas somewhat troubled by the procedural posture of the case\neven though, as I understand it, he was perhaps partly to blame\nfor the procedural posture of the case, but it's not like Boies\nSchiller came in here and asked for relief from the protective\norder. And I am curious about why Boies Schiller didn't do\nthat.",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "MR. ROSSMILLER: Your Honor, what I can tell you about\nthat is we, the government, thought that we were in a position\nto make the application via the All Writs Act submission that\nwe originally made, that that would be an appropriate vehicle\nfor the relief that we, as the government, were seeking in\nconnection with the protective order. So I'm not sure --",
  30. "position": "main"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "THE COURT: You're seeking to have a third party, to\nhave Boies Schiller, who were counsel for the plaintiffs in the\nMaxwell action, be relieved from the protective order, but if\nthere's anybody on this planet who is capable of asking,\n\"Please relieve us from the strictures of this protective",
  35. "position": "main"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300 SDNY_GM_00000861\nDOJ-OGR-00004903",
  40. "position": "footer"
  41. }
  42. ],
  43. "entities": {
  44. "people": [
  45. "Judge Sweet",
  46. "Rossmiller"
  47. ],
  48. "organizations": [
  49. "Boies Schiller",
  50. "Southern District Reporters, P.C."
  51. ],
  52. "locations": [],
  53. "dates": [
  54. "07/02/21"
  55. ],
  56. "reference_numbers": [
  57. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  58. "311-1",
  59. "SDNY_GM_00000861",
  60. "DOJ-OGR-00004903"
  61. ]
  62. },
  63. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a header indicating it is page 10 of 23. The content discusses legal proceedings and references specific cases and legal concepts. The footer includes information about the court reporters and reference numbers."
  64. }