DOJ-OGR-00005611.json 3.9 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "2",
  4. "document_number": "385",
  5. "date": "10/29/21",
  6. "document_type": "Court Document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 385 Filed 10/29/21 Page 2 of 12\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nBACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................... 1\nI. 2020 Amendments to Rule 404(b)............................................................................................ 1\nII. Rule 404(b) Notice in This Case ............................................................................................ 2\nARGUMENT ............................................................................................................................... 4\nI. By Failing to Comply with the Rule 404(b) Notice Requirement, the Government Has\nWaived the Admission of Any Evidence Pursuant to the Rule.................................................... 4\nII. Should the Government's Failure Be Excused, Ms. Maxwell Requests an Opportunity to\nRebut any Proffered Non-Propensity Purpose and Basis............................................................ 5\nIII. Ms. Maxwell Needs Additional Time to Respond to the Scant Notice that the Materials\nQualify as \"Direct Evidence\" in the Case .................................................................................... 6\nCONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................ 7\ni\nDOJ-OGR-00005611",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 385 Filed 10/29/21 Page 2 of 12",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
  20. "position": "top"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................... 1\nI. 2020 Amendments to Rule 404(b)............................................................................................ 1\nII. Rule 404(b) Notice in This Case ............................................................................................ 2\nARGUMENT ............................................................................................................................... 4\nI. By Failing to Comply with the Rule 404(b) Notice Requirement, the Government Has\nWaived the Admission of Any Evidence Pursuant to the Rule.................................................... 4\nII. Should the Government's Failure Be Excused, Ms. Maxwell Requests an Opportunity to\nRebut any Proffered Non-Propensity Purpose and Basis............................................................ 5\nIII. Ms. Maxwell Needs Additional Time to Respond to the Scant Notice that the Materials\nQualify as \"Direct Evidence\" in the Case .................................................................................... 6\nCONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................ 7",
  25. "position": "middle"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "i",
  30. "position": "bottom"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005611",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "Ms. Maxwell"
  41. ],
  42. "organizations": [
  43. "Government",
  44. "DOJ"
  45. ],
  46. "locations": [],
  47. "dates": [
  48. "10/29/21"
  49. ],
  50. "reference_numbers": [
  51. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  52. "385",
  53. "DOJ-OGR-00005611"
  54. ]
  55. },
  56. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case involving Ms. Maxwell. The table of contents suggests that the document discusses Rule 404(b) and its application to the case."
  57. }