mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009480.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "63",
    "document_number": "1:20-cr-00330",
    "date": null,
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 161 Filed 02/24/22 Page 63 of 117 A-5904\n\nCAC3PARC 2\n1 (In open court)\n2 THE DEPUTY CLERK: Case of United States of America v.\n3 David Parse. Appearances for the government?\n4 MS. DAVIS: Good afternoon, your Honor. Nanette Davis\n5 and Stanley J. Okula, Jr. for the government.\n6 THE COURT: Good afternoon, Ms. Davis.\n7 MR. SHECHTMAN: Paul Shechtman for Mr. Parse. Ali\n8 Feingold who is a paralegal who has worked on this matter is\n9 with me, and obviously Mr. Parse is here.\n10 THE COURT: Good afternoon, Mr. Shechtman. And I note\n11 the presence of Mr. Parse at counsel table.\n12 This is oral argument on the defendant Parse's motion\n13 for a new trial. Do you wish to be heard, Mr. Shechtman?\n14 MR. SHECHTMAN: I do, your Honor. As your Honor now\n15 knows and from the papers, there is only one issue here which\n16 is a question of ineffective assistance of counsel.\n17 THE COURT: If you can just pull the mike a little\n18 closer. It has been a long week.\n19 MR. SHECHTMAN: I understand. I think for all of us.\n20 Justice O'Connor once said that Strickland was the\n21 most cited case that she ever wrote, and I say that because I\n22 assume the Court is quite familiar with it and the legal\n23 standard. And obviously the standard is two part.\n24 I would like to think, though, I may be proven wrong,\n25 that if we get to prejudice, we should prevail. But we can\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00009480",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 161 Filed 02/24/22 Page 63 of 117 A-5904",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "CAC3PARC 2\n1 (In open court)\n2 THE DEPUTY CLERK: Case of United States of America v.\n3 David Parse. Appearances for the government?\n4 MS. DAVIS: Good afternoon, your Honor. Nanette Davis\n5 and Stanley J. Okula, Jr. for the government.\n6 THE COURT: Good afternoon, Ms. Davis.\n7 MR. SHECHTMAN: Paul Shechtman for Mr. Parse. Ali\n8 Feingold who is a paralegal who has worked on this matter is\n9 with me, and obviously Mr. Parse is here.\n10 THE COURT: Good afternoon, Mr. Shechtman. And I note\n11 the presence of Mr. Parse at counsel table.\n12 This is oral argument on the defendant Parse's motion\n13 for a new trial. Do you wish to be heard, Mr. Shechtman?\n14 MR. SHECHTMAN: I do, your Honor. As your Honor now\n15 knows and from the papers, there is only one issue here which\n16 is a question of ineffective assistance of counsel.\n17 THE COURT: If you can just pull the mike a little\n18 closer. It has been a long week.\n19 MR. SHECHTMAN: I understand. I think for all of us.\n20 Justice O'Connor once said that Strickland was the\n21 most cited case that she ever wrote, and I say that because I\n22 assume the Court is quite familiar with it and the legal\n23 standard. And obviously the standard is two part.\n24 I would like to think, though, I may be proven wrong,\n25 that if we get to prejudice, we should prevail. But we can",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009480",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "David Parse",
      "Nanette Davis",
      "Stanley J. Okula, Jr.",
      "Paul Shechtman",
      "Ali Feingold",
      "Justice O'Connor"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330",
      "A-5904",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009480"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document is a court transcript with clear and legible text. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}