| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677787980 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "13",
- "document_number": "338",
- "date": "10/12/21",
- "document_type": "court document",
- "has_handwriting": true,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 338 Filed 10/12/21 Page 13 of 22\nHouse Proposal H.R. 31303 (1989), \"any sex offense ...regardless of force....\" But Dewines second proposal was written as \"sexual or physical abuse of sexual exploitation,\" H.R. 3958 (1990). In the Senate \"sexual or physical abuse or exploitation (s.1923 and 1965 (1990)) became \"sex crime involving a child ...\" see 1984, \"...the proposed federal statute defining sex crimes properly does not include incest as a seperatly defined offense.\" 1984 p.95 mrs. Toening Assistant A.G. ... sexual Exploitation was removed from the bill as enacted, presumably because it wasn't included in the 1986 SAA. Nor does sexual exploitation punish the independant crime of sexual abuse, or necessarily involve it.\nPrecluding Other Limitations\nSection 3509(k) was enacted to preclude other limitations, because it was enacted for territorial and maritime jurisdictions where other limitations controlled see united states v. Roberts, 1 F. Supp. 2d 601 (5th cir. 1998) (applying 18 usc § 2243 (a) to a foreign ship in foreign water using §7(1)(8).\n1. Sex crime is defined but not used at 3509(a)(18).\nDOJ-OGR-00005191",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 338 Filed 10/12/21 Page 13 of 22",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "handwritten",
- "content": "House Proposal H.R. 31303 (1989), \"any sex offense ...regardless of force....\" But Dewines second proposal was written as \"sexual or physical abuse of sexual exploitation,\" H.R. 3958 (1990). In the Senate \"sexual or physical abuse or exploitation (s.1923 and 1965 (1990)) became \"sex crime involving a child ...\" see 1984, \"...the proposed federal statute defining sex crimes properly does not include incest as a seperatly defined offense.\" 1984 p.95 mrs. Toening Assistant A.G. ... sexual Exploitation was removed from the bill as enacted, presumably because it wasn't included in the 1986 SAA. Nor does sexual exploitation punish the independant crime of sexual abuse, or necessarily involve it.",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "handwritten",
- "content": "Precluding Other Limitations",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "handwritten",
- "content": "Section 3509(k) was enacted to preclude other limitations, because it was enacted for territorial and maritime jurisdictions where other limitations controlled see united states v. Roberts, 1 F. Supp. 2d 601 (5th cir. 1998) (applying 18 usc § 2243 (a) to a foreign ship in foreign water using §7(1)(8).",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "handwritten",
- "content": "1. Sex crime is defined but not used at 3509(a)(18).",
- "position": "bottom"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005191",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Dewines",
- "Toening",
- "Roberts"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "House",
- "Senate",
- "DOJ"
- ],
- "locations": [
- "United States"
- ],
- "dates": [
- "1989",
- "1990",
- "1984",
- "1986",
- "1998",
- "10/12/21"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "H.R. 31303",
- "H.R. 3958",
- "s.1923",
- "s.1965",
- "1984 p.95",
- "1 F. Supp. 2d 601",
- "18 usc § 2243 (a)",
- "§7(1)(8)",
- "3509(k)",
- "3509(a)(18)",
- "DOJ-OGR-00005191"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with handwritten notes discussing various legal proposals and statutes related to sex crimes and child exploitation. The handwriting is generally legible, but some words are difficult to decipher due to the quality of the scan."
- }
|