mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000452.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "8",
    "document_number": "24",
    "date": "July 16, 2019",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 24 Filed 07/16/19 Page 8 of 9\n\nHon. Richard M. Berman\nJuly 16, 2019\nPage 8\n\n1980s, when hijackings were prevalent, in connection to Middle East travel. The passport was for personal protection in the event of travel to dangerous areas, only to be presented to potential kidnapers, hijackers or terrorists should violent episodes occur.\n\nNinth, the Court is undoubtedly aware of the highly charged context surrounding this prosecution. In November 2018, media reports suggested that Epstein received a plea deal that amounted to a \"slap on the wrist.\" Putting aside the robust negotiations leading to the non-prosecution agreement and the prison sentence Epstein completed, there's no denying that although certain witnesses through their attorney representatives,11 the media - e.g., The Miami Herald - and the public were all clamoring for his re-prosecution, Epstein traveled extensively over these eight months and invariably returned to the United States. That inescapable reality emphatically proves he won't flee and entitles him to release - on any and all conditions the Court deems appropriate.\n\n11 See, e.g., Doe v. US, CV 807-36 (SD Fla.).\n\nDOJ-OGR-00000452",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 24 Filed 07/16/19 Page 8 of 9",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Hon. Richard M. Berman\nJuly 16, 2019\nPage 8",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1980s, when hijackings were prevalent, in connection to Middle East travel. The passport was for personal protection in the event of travel to dangerous areas, only to be presented to potential kidnapers, hijackers or terrorists should violent episodes occur.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Ninth, the Court is undoubtedly aware of the highly charged context surrounding this prosecution. In November 2018, media reports suggested that Epstein received a plea deal that amounted to a \"slap on the wrist.\" Putting aside the robust negotiations leading to the non-prosecution agreement and the prison sentence Epstein completed, there's no denying that although certain witnesses through their attorney representatives,11 the media - e.g., The Miami Herald - and the public were all clamoring for his re-prosecution, Epstein traveled extensively over these eight months and invariably returned to the United States. That inescapable reality emphatically proves he won't flee and entitles him to release - on any and all conditions the Court deems appropriate.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "11 See, e.g., Doe v. US, CV 807-36 (SD Fla.).",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000452",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Richard M. Berman",
      "Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "The Miami Herald"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Middle East",
      "United States"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "July 16, 2019",
      "November 2018"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "Document 24",
      "CV 807-36",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000452"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Jeffrey Epstein. The text is well-formatted and clear, with no visible redactions or damage."
}