mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000555.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "45",
    "document_number": "36",
    "date": "07/24/19",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 45 of 74 45\n1 thought I read in all of these papers somewhere that New Mexico\n2 was examining its decision that he needn't be registered in that state.\n3\n4 MR. WEINBERG: It may be. And if they advise that he\n5 is to register --\n6 THE COURT: He would I'm sure.\n7 MR. WEINBERG: -- it is just an incremental additional\n8 registration obligation because he's under so many in Florida,\n9 New York, and the Virgin Islands.\n10 The so other part of danger -- and I apologize. I\n11 will get to flight --\n12 THE COURT: No apology needed.\n13 MR. WEINBERG: -- is the government allegation that as\n14 a result of the incident reports in Palm Beach dating back to\n15 2006 that Mr. Epstein is a danger to others and should be\n16 detained.\n17 What I would respond to that is that the report -- and\n18 I showed Mr. Rossmiller a slightly better, unredacted version\n19 of page 86 of an incident report of Detective Recarey from the\n20 Palm Beach Police -- reflected that the date of the complaints\n21 by the parents was May 22 or May 23, 2008.\n22 It was the week that Mr. Epstein had hired new counsel\n23 there which was a Mr. Jack Goldberger from West Palm Beach.\n24 And Mr. Goldberger was scheduled, according to the incident\n25 report, to meet with the representatives of the State\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00000555",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 45 of 74 45",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 thought I read in all of these papers somewhere that New Mexico\n2 was examining its decision that he needn't be registered in that state.\n3\n4 MR. WEINBERG: It may be. And if they advise that he\n5 is to register --\n6 THE COURT: He would I'm sure.\n7 MR. WEINBERG: -- it is just an incremental additional\n8 registration obligation because he's under so many in Florida,\n9 New York, and the Virgin Islands.\n10 The so other part of danger -- and I apologize. I\n11 will get to flight --\n12 THE COURT: No apology needed.\n13 MR. WEINBERG: -- is the government allegation that as\n14 a result of the incident reports in Palm Beach dating back to\n15 2006 that Mr. Epstein is a danger to others and should be\n16 detained.\n17 What I would respond to that is that the report -- and\n18 I showed Mr. Rossmiller a slightly better, unredacted version\n19 of page 86 of an incident report of Detective Recarey from the\n20 Palm Beach Police -- reflected that the date of the complaints\n21 by the parents was May 22 or May 23, 2008.\n22 It was the week that Mr. Epstein had hired new counsel\n23 there which was a Mr. Jack Goldberger from West Palm Beach.\n24 And Mr. Goldberger was scheduled, according to the incident\n25 report, to meet with the representatives of the State",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000555",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Weinberg",
      "Mr. Epstein",
      "Mr. Rossmiller",
      "Detective Recarey",
      "Mr. Jack Goldberger"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Palm Beach Police",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New Mexico",
      "Florida",
      "New York",
      "Virgin Islands",
      "Palm Beach",
      "West Palm Beach"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "07/24/19",
      "2006",
      "May 22, 2008",
      "May 23, 2008"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "Document 36",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000555"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the text."
}