mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00002121.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "26 of 29",
    "document_number": "97-21",
    "date": "12/14/20",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 97-21 Filed 12/14/20 Page 26 of 29\n\nCases where the requested person consents to extradition\n\nSending the case to the Secretary of State\nNo statutory time-limit6\nComment [5]: in practice, where the requested person consents to extradition, the case is sent to the Secretary of State straight away\n\nOrder for extradition\nTwo months of the date on which the case is sent to the Secretary of State7\nComment [6]: where the requested person consents to extradition, the Secretary of State does not need to wait four weeks to consider any representations from the requested person before ordering extradition: section 93(7)\n\nRemoval\n28 days of the order for extradition8\n\nCases where there is an extradition hearing\n\nThe date of the extradition hearing (provisional arrest)\nTwo months from the date on which the Secretary of State sends the documents to the extradition judge. That date can be extended by the extradition judge on application by one of the parties where the judge considers it to be \"in the interests of justice\" to fix a later date. The time-limit can be extended more than once9\nComment [7]: in practice, the extradition judge often \"opens\" the extradition hearing at the initial hearing with the effect that this time-limit ceases to run\n\nThe date of the extradition hearing (arrest pursuant to a full request)\nTwo months from the initial hearing. That date can be extended by the extradition judge on application by one of the parties where the judge considers it to be \"in the interests of justice\" to fix a later date. The time-limit can be extended more than once10\nComment [8]: in practice, the extradition judge often \"opens\" the extradition hearing at the initial hearing with the effect that this time-limit ceases to run\n\n6 Extradition Act 2003, s. 128.\n7 Extradition Act 2003, s. 99(3).\n8 Extradition Act 2003, s. 117(2)(a).\n9 Extradition Act 2003, s. 76(3)-(4).\n10 Extradition Act 2003, s. 75(2)-(3).\n\nDOJ-OGR-00002121",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 97-21 Filed 12/14/20 Page 26 of 29",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Cases where the requested person consents to extradition",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Sending the case to the Secretary of State\nNo statutory time-limit6\nComment [5]: in practice, where the requested person consents to extradition, the case is sent to the Secretary of State straight away",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Order for extradition\nTwo months of the date on which the case is sent to the Secretary of State7\nComment [6]: where the requested person consents to extradition, the Secretary of State does not need to wait four weeks to consider any representations from the requested person before ordering extradition: section 93(7)",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Removal\n28 days of the order for extradition8",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Cases where there is an extradition hearing",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The date of the extradition hearing (provisional arrest)\nTwo months from the date on which the Secretary of State sends the documents to the extradition judge. That date can be extended by the extradition judge on application by one of the parties where the judge considers it to be \"in the interests of justice\" to fix a later date. The time-limit can be extended more than once9\nComment [7]: in practice, the extradition judge often \"opens\" the extradition hearing at the initial hearing with the effect that this time-limit ceases to run",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The date of the extradition hearing (arrest pursuant to a full request)\nTwo months from the initial hearing. That date can be extended by the extradition judge on application by one of the parties where the judge considers it to be \"in the interests of justice\" to fix a later date. The time-limit can be extended more than once10\nComment [8]: in practice, the extradition judge often \"opens\" the extradition hearing at the initial hearing with the effect that this time-limit ceases to run",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "6 Extradition Act 2003, s. 128.\n7 Extradition Act 2003, s. 99(3).\n8 Extradition Act 2003, s. 117(2)(a).\n9 Extradition Act 2003, s. 76(3)-(4).\n10 Extradition Act 2003, s. 75(2)-(3).",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002121",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "Secretary of State"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "12/14/20"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "97-21",
      "DOJ-OGR-00002121"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court document related to extradition proceedings. The text is mostly printed, with some footnotes and comments. There are no visible stamps or handwritten text."
}