mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00002938.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "4",
    "document_number": "204",
    "date": "04/16/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 Filed 04/16/21 Page 4 of 239\n\nVI. Counts Five and Six Are Properly Joined and Should Not Be Severed................. 138\nA. Applicable Law............................................................................... 138\nB. Discussion................................................................................ 141\n\nVII. The Indictment Contains the Elements of Each Offense and Provides the Defendant More Than Adequate Notice of the Charges Against Her ................. 150\nA. Applicable Law ............................................................................... 150\nB. Discussion................................................................................ 152\n\nVIII. There Is No Basis to Strike Any Portion of the Indictment........................ 157\nA. Relevant Facts............................................................................... 158\nB. Applicable Law ............................................................................... 159\nC. Discussion................................................................................ 161\n\nIX. The Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count One or Count Three as Multiplicitous Is Premature ................................................................................ 169\nA. Relevant Facts............................................................................... 169\nB. Applicable Law ............................................................................... 170\nC. Discussion................................................................................ 172\n\nX. The Defendant's Various Disclosure Motions Should be Denied ....................... 174\nA. Bill of Particulars Is Not Warranted ....................................................... 174\n1. Applicable Law......................................................................... 174\n2. Discussion............................................................................... 178\nB. The Defendant's Requests for Early Production of a Witness List and Jencks Act Material Should Be Denied ........................................................ 182\n1. Applicable Law......................................................................... 182\n2. Discussion............................................................................... 184\nC. The Defendant's Additional Requests for Disclosure Should Be Denied ............. 185\n\nXI. The Use of a Grand Jury Siting in White Plains Was Entirely Proper ................ 193\nA. Background................................................................................ 194\n1. The SDNY and Local Rules for the Division of Business ....................... 194\n2. The SDNY Jury Plan................................................................... 195\nB. Applicable Law ............................................................................... 197\nC. Discussion................................................................................ 198\n1. The Defendant Was Properly Indicted by a Grand Jury Sitting in White Plains ..... 198\n2. The Defendant's Fair Cross-Section Claim Is Meritless............................ 205\na. The Defendant Has Not Established that Blacks or Hispanics Are Unfairly Represented ........................................................................ 205\nb. Any Potential Underrepresentation Is Not Due to Systematic Exclusion.......... 210\n\nCONCLUSION ........................................................................................ 212\niii\nDOJ-OGR-00002938",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 Filed 04/16/21 Page 4 of 239",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "VI. Counts Five and Six Are Properly Joined and Should Not Be Severed................. 138\nA. Applicable Law............................................................................... 138\nB. Discussion................................................................................ 141\n\nVII. The Indictment Contains the Elements of Each Offense and Provides the Defendant More Than Adequate Notice of the Charges Against Her ................. 150\nA. Applicable Law ............................................................................... 150\nB. Discussion................................................................................ 152\n\nVIII. There Is No Basis to Strike Any Portion of the Indictment........................ 157\nA. Relevant Facts............................................................................... 158\nB. Applicable Law ............................................................................... 159\nC. Discussion................................................................................ 161\n\nIX. The Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count One or Count Three as Multiplicitous Is Premature ................................................................................ 169\nA. Relevant Facts............................................................................... 169\nB. Applicable Law ............................................................................... 170\nC. Discussion................................................................................ 172\n\nX. The Defendant's Various Disclosure Motions Should be Denied ....................... 174\nA. Bill of Particulars Is Not Warranted ....................................................... 174\n1. Applicable Law......................................................................... 174\n2. Discussion............................................................................... 178\nB. The Defendant's Requests for Early Production of a Witness List and Jencks Act Material Should Be Denied ........................................................ 182\n1. Applicable Law......................................................................... 182\n2. Discussion............................................................................... 184\nC. The Defendant's Additional Requests for Disclosure Should Be Denied ............. 185\n\nXI. The Use of a Grand Jury Siting in White Plains Was Entirely Proper ................ 193\nA. Background................................................................................ 194\n1. The SDNY and Local Rules for the Division of Business ....................... 194\n2. The SDNY Jury Plan................................................................... 195\nB. Applicable Law ............................................................................... 197\nC. Discussion................................................................................ 198\n1. The Defendant Was Properly Indicted by a Grand Jury Sitting in White Plains ..... 198\n2. The Defendant's Fair Cross-Section Claim Is Meritless............................ 205\na. The Defendant Has Not Established that Blacks or Hispanics Are Unfairly Represented ........................................................................ 205\nb. Any Potential Underrepresentation Is Not Due to Systematic Exclusion.......... 210\n\nCONCLUSION ........................................................................................ 212",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "iii",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002938",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "SDNY"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "White Plains"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "04/16/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "204",
      "DOJ-OGR-00002938"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The text is well-formatted and mostly clear. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}