DOJ-OGR-00003918.json 4.9 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182838485868788
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "1",
  4. "document_number": "227",
  5. "date": "April 21, 2021",
  6. "document_type": "Letter",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 227 Filed 04/21/21 Page 1 of 3\nU.S. Department of Justice\nUnited States Attorney\nSouthern District of New York\nThe Silvio J. Mollo Building\nOne Saint Andrew's Plaza\nNew York, New York 10007\nApril 21, 2021\nBY ECF\nThe Honorable Alison J. Nathan\nUnited States District Court\nSouthern District of New York\nUnited States Courthouse\n40 Foley Square\nNew York, New York 10007\nRe: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)\nDear Judge Nathan:\nThe Government respectfully submits this letter in response to the Court's Order dated April 19, 2021, which directed the Government to notify the Court whether it intends to \"use any of the documents subject to the pending motions to suppress in the trial of the non-perjury counts in this case.\" (Dkt. No. 216). As an initial matter, the Government strongly opposes the defendant's suppression motions, and the Government respectfully submits that the Court should deny the motions on the merits without an evidentiary hearing. However, in the interest of efficiency, and with the goal of streamlining matters in advance of trial, the Government respectfully submits that the Court need not resolve the pending suppression motions in advance of the trial on the non-perjury counts.\nResolution of the suppression motions is not necessary at this juncture, because, after considering the matter, the Government does not intend to use these materials in its case-in-chief at the trial of the non-perjury counts in this case. However, the Government notes that the materials\nDOJ-OGR-00003918",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 227 Filed 04/21/21 Page 1 of 3",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "U.S. Department of Justice\nUnited States Attorney\nSouthern District of New York\nThe Silvio J. Mollo Building\nOne Saint Andrew's Plaza\nNew York, New York 10007",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "April 21, 2021",
  25. "position": "header"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "BY ECF",
  30. "position": "top"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "The Honorable Alison J. Nathan\nUnited States District Court\nSouthern District of New York\nUnited States Courthouse\n40 Foley Square\nNew York, New York 10007",
  35. "position": "top"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
  40. "position": "top"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "Dear Judge Nathan:",
  45. "position": "top"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "The Government respectfully submits this letter in response to the Court's Order dated April 19, 2021, which directed the Government to notify the Court whether it intends to \"use any of the documents subject to the pending motions to suppress in the trial of the non-perjury counts in this case.\" (Dkt. No. 216). As an initial matter, the Government strongly opposes the defendant's suppression motions, and the Government respectfully submits that the Court should deny the motions on the merits without an evidentiary hearing. However, in the interest of efficiency, and with the goal of streamlining matters in advance of trial, the Government respectfully submits that the Court need not resolve the pending suppression motions in advance of the trial on the non-perjury counts.",
  50. "position": "middle"
  51. },
  52. {
  53. "type": "printed",
  54. "content": "Resolution of the suppression motions is not necessary at this juncture, because, after considering the matter, the Government does not intend to use these materials in its case-in-chief at the trial of the non-perjury counts in this case. However, the Government notes that the materials",
  55. "position": "middle"
  56. },
  57. {
  58. "type": "printed",
  59. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00003918",
  60. "position": "footer"
  61. }
  62. ],
  63. "entities": {
  64. "people": [
  65. "Alison J. Nathan",
  66. "Ghislaine Maxwell"
  67. ],
  68. "organizations": [
  69. "U.S. Department of Justice",
  70. "United States District Court",
  71. "United States Attorney"
  72. ],
  73. "locations": [
  74. "New York"
  75. ],
  76. "dates": [
  77. "April 21, 2021",
  78. "April 19, 2021"
  79. ],
  80. "reference_numbers": [
  81. "20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
  82. "Dkt. No. 216",
  83. "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  84. "Document 227"
  85. ]
  86. },
  87. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a formal letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to the Honorable Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document is typed and has no visible handwriting or stamps. The content is formal and professional, indicating a legal or court-related document."
  88. }