DOJ-OGR-00005256.json 3.9 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "1",
  4. "document_number": "357",
  5. "date": "10/18/21",
  6. "document_type": "Court Document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 357 Filed 10/18/21 Page 1 of 4\n\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\n---------------------------------------------------------------X\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA,\n\nv.\n\nGHISLAINE MAXWELL,\n\nDefendant.\n---------------------------------------------------------------X\n\nDEFENDANT GHISLAINE MAXWELL'S\nNOTICE OF MOTIONS IN LIMINE\n\nPLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon the accompanying memoranda and exhibits,\nDefendant Ghislaine Maxwell, through counsel, hereby moves the Court in limine to exclude\ncertain evidence during her upcoming trial. Specifically, Ms. Maxwell hereby gives notice of\nher filing of the following motions:\n\n1. Motion to Preclude the Introduction of Alleged Co-Conspirator Statements as a\nSanction for Failing to Comply with This Court's September 3, 2021 Order\n\n2. Motion to Exclude Any Evidence Offered by the Government Pursuant to Fed. R.\nEvid. 404(b) for Failure to Comply with the Rule's Notice Requirement;\n\n3. Motion to Exclude Under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow\nPharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and Request for Daubert Hearing;\n\n4. Motion to Exclude Evidence Related to Accuser-3;\n\n5. Motion to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Flight;\n\nDOJ-OGR-00005256",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 357 Filed 10/18/21 Page 1 of 4",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
  20. "position": "top"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,\n\nv.\n\nGHISLAINE MAXWELL,\n\nDefendant.",
  25. "position": "top"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
  30. "position": "top"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DEFENDANT GHISLAINE MAXWELL'S\nNOTICE OF MOTIONS IN LIMINE",
  35. "position": "middle"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon the accompanying memoranda and exhibits,\nDefendant Ghislaine Maxwell, through counsel, hereby moves the Court in limine to exclude\ncertain evidence during her upcoming trial. Specifically, Ms. Maxwell hereby gives notice of\nher filing of the following motions:",
  40. "position": "middle"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "1. Motion to Preclude the Introduction of Alleged Co-Conspirator Statements as a\nSanction for Failing to Comply with This Court's September 3, 2021 Order\n\n2. Motion to Exclude Any Evidence Offered by the Government Pursuant to Fed. R.\nEvid. 404(b) for Failure to Comply with the Rule's Notice Requirement;\n\n3. Motion to Exclude Under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow\nPharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and Request for Daubert Hearing;\n\n4. Motion to Exclude Evidence Related to Accuser-3;\n\n5. Motion to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Flight;",
  45. "position": "middle"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005256",
  50. "position": "footer"
  51. }
  52. ],
  53. "entities": {
  54. "people": [
  55. "Ghislaine Maxwell"
  56. ],
  57. "organizations": [
  58. "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT",
  59. "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
  60. ],
  61. "locations": [
  62. "NEW YORK"
  63. ],
  64. "dates": [
  65. "10/18/21",
  66. "September 3, 2021",
  67. "1993"
  68. ],
  69. "reference_numbers": [
  70. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  71. "Document 357",
  72. "20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
  73. "509 U.S. 579",
  74. "DOJ-OGR-00005256"
  75. ]
  76. },
  77. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing in a criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The text is clear and legible, with no apparent redactions or damage."
  78. }