mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005584.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "30 of 40",
    "document_number": "383",
    "date": "10/29/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 383 Filed 10/29/21 Page 30 of 40\ntheoretical relevance this could have. That problem is only compounded by the fact that, if the defense wishes to try to show that the Government's investigations were sloppy, the Government is entitled to rebut that argument with evidence of its thoroughness and care—creating a mini-trial that is immaterial to the jury's function.\nB. Evidence of the Non-Prosecution Agreement is Not Otherwise Admissible for Any Purpose\nThe defense argues that evidence of the NPA is nonetheless admissible for impeachment, specifically to show the bias and interest of (Def. Opp. at 29). The Court should reject that baseless argument as mere pretext to put the NPA before the jury, in an attempt to confuse and mislead the jury and argue for jury nullification.\n29\nDOJ-OGR-00005584",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 383 Filed 10/29/21 Page 30 of 40",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "theoretical relevance this could have. That problem is only compounded by the fact that, if the defense wishes to try to show that the Government's investigations were sloppy, the Government is entitled to rebut that argument with evidence of its thoroughness and care—creating a mini-trial that is immaterial to the jury's function.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "B. Evidence of the Non-Prosecution Agreement is Not Otherwise Admissible for Any Purpose",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The defense argues that evidence of the NPA is nonetheless admissible for impeachment, specifically to show the bias and interest of (Def. Opp. at 29). The Court should reject that baseless argument as mere pretext to put the NPA before the jury, in an attempt to confuse and mislead the jury and argue for jury nullification.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "29",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005584",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "Government",
      "Court",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "10/29/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 383",
      "DOJ-OGR-00005584"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with redactions. The text is mostly clear, but some information is blacked out."
}