mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006213.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "424",
    "date": "11/08/21",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 424 Filed 11/08/21 Page 2 of 41\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nPRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................... 1\n\nI. THE COURT SHOULD PRECLUDE CERTAIN OPINIONS FROM DR. DIETZ ............... 1\n    A. Background ........................................................................................................... 1\n    B. Legal Standard....................................................................................................... 6\n    C. Discussion ............................................................................................................. 9\n        1. Response to the Opinions of Dr. Rocchio........................................................... 9\n        2. Opinions as to Hindsight Bias............................................................................ 12\n        3. Opinions as to the \"Halo Effect\" ....................................................................... 15\n        4. Opinions as to \"Pathways to False Allegations of Sexual Assault\" .................... 18\n        5. Opinions Regarding the Credibility of Witnesses............................................... 22\n        6. Opinions Regarding Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms ...................................... 23\n\nII. CERTAIN ASPECTS OF THE PROPOSED EXPERT TESTIMONY OF DR. ELIZABETH LOFTUS SHOULD BE PRECLUDED ............................................................... 25\n    A. Background ......................................................................................................... 25\n    B. Applicable Law ................................................................................................... 26\n    C. Discussion ........................................................................................................... 30\n        1. Opinions as to False Memory Formation........................................................... 30\n        2. Commonsense Principles Within the Ken of the Jury ....................................... 33\n        3. Opinions Bearing on Witness Credibility and Demeanor.................................... 34\n        4. Factual Narratives About the Case .................................................................... 35\n\nIII. IF DEFENSE CHALLENGES TO DR. ROCCHIO ARE ACCEPTED, THE DEFENSE EXPERTS SHOULD BE EXCLUDED ............................................................................... 35\n\nCONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................ 37\n\nDOJ-OGR-00006213",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 424 Filed 11/08/21 Page 2 of 41",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................... 1\n\nI. THE COURT SHOULD PRECLUDE CERTAIN OPINIONS FROM DR. DIETZ ............... 1\n    A. Background ........................................................................................................... 1\n    B. Legal Standard....................................................................................................... 6\n    C. Discussion ............................................................................................................. 9\n        1. Response to the Opinions of Dr. Rocchio........................................................... 9\n        2. Opinions as to Hindsight Bias............................................................................ 12\n        3. Opinions as to the \"Halo Effect\" ....................................................................... 15\n        4. Opinions as to \"Pathways to False Allegations of Sexual Assault\" .................... 18\n        5. Opinions Regarding the Credibility of Witnesses............................................... 22\n        6. Opinions Regarding Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms ...................................... 23\n\nII. CERTAIN ASPECTS OF THE PROPOSED EXPERT TESTIMONY OF DR. ELIZABETH LOFTUS SHOULD BE PRECLUDED ............................................................... 25\n    A. Background ......................................................................................................... 25\n    B. Applicable Law ................................................................................................... 26\n    C. Discussion ........................................................................................................... 30\n        1. Opinions as to False Memory Formation........................................................... 30\n        2. Commonsense Principles Within the Ken of the Jury ....................................... 33\n        3. Opinions Bearing on Witness Credibility and Demeanor.................................... 34\n        4. Factual Narratives About the Case .................................................................... 35\n\nIII. IF DEFENSE CHALLENGES TO DR. ROCCHIO ARE ACCEPTED, THE DEFENSE EXPERTS SHOULD BE EXCLUDED ............................................................................... 35\n\nCONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................ 37",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00006213",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Dr. Dietz",
      "Dr. Rocchio",
      "Dr. Elizabeth Loftus"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/08/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 424",
      "DOJ-OGR-00006213"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a table of contents. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
}