mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007010.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "38",
    "document_number": "459",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 459 Filed 11/15/21 Page 38 of 43 38\n\n1 judge there in person. I can do that, but there are space\n2 limitations to get enough potential jurors in the room to take\n3 these that we wouldn't be able to fit counsel table and the\n4 parties in the room. I would also have to repeat it six times,\n5 since we have two panels a day over three days.\n6 Another option that occurs to me is to record a short\n7 video, which the jury department would simply play in advance\n8 of each panel filling out the questionnaire. Either way, I\n9 would distribute the script of what I would say before I record\n10 it to counsel so that you can weigh in or object or make any\n11 changes.\n12 Let me hear your views as to that question regarding\n13 the logistics of some preliminary instructions from me.\n14 Ms. Pomerantz.\n15 MS. POMERANTZ: Thank you, your Honor.\n16 The government has no preference and defers to what\n17 the Court prefers.\n18 THE COURT: OK.\n19 Ms. Sternheim.\n20 MS. STERNHEIM: I think that's a fine idea, Judge, so\n21 you don't have to repeat it six times. But I do have a\n22 question, since you just mentioned counsel table. Is there an\n23 expectation that counsel be present on the days that the\n24 questionnaires are completed?\n25 THE COURT: No. I think the only reason we would even\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00007010",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 459 Filed 11/15/21 Page 38 of 43 38",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 judge there in person. I can do that, but there are space\n2 limitations to get enough potential jurors in the room to take\n3 these that we wouldn't be able to fit counsel table and the\n4 parties in the room. I would also have to repeat it six times,\n5 since we have two panels a day over three days.\n6 Another option that occurs to me is to record a short\n7 video, which the jury department would simply play in advance\n8 of each panel filling out the questionnaire. Either way, I\n9 would distribute the script of what I would say before I record\n10 it to counsel so that you can weigh in or object or make any\n11 changes.\n12 Let me hear your views as to that question regarding\n13 the logistics of some preliminary instructions from me.\n14 Ms. Pomerantz.\n15 MS. POMERANTZ: Thank you, your Honor.\n16 The government has no preference and defers to what\n17 the Court prefers.\n18 THE COURT: OK.\n19 Ms. Sternheim.\n20 MS. STERNHEIM: I think that's a fine idea, Judge, so\n21 you don't have to repeat it six times. But I do have a\n22 question, since you just mentioned counsel table. Is there an\n23 expectation that counsel be present on the days that the\n24 questionnaires are completed?\n25 THE COURT: No. I think the only reason we would even",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007010",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Pomerantz",
      "Ms. Sternheim"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/15/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "459",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007010"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}