mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007089.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "38",
    "document_number": "465",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 38 of 127 LB15MAX2 38 1 THE COURT: From your perspective, anything further that could be addressed at this time or needs to be addressed? 2 MR. PAGLIUCA: On this topic your Honor? 3 THE COURT: Yes. 4 MR. PAGLIUCA: No. 5 THE COURT: Ms. Moe? 6 MS. MOE: No, your Honor. Thank you. 7 THE COURT: The next is government 9 which is to preclude evidence or argument sounding in nullification. I 8 agree with the defense that there is no need for me to rule on 9 this presently. I trust that defense counsel knows well the 10 clear rules around any such arguments so it is a bit hard to 11 think about what guidance I can offer here. 12 Ms. Moe, is there a specific concern you want to 13 raise? 14 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor. 15 Aside from the examples we proffered in our motion, 16 there is nothing in particular that this motion is aimed at and 17 so I don't think anything more along those lines to address 18 today. 19 MS. STERNHEIM: Nothing at this time. 20 THE COURT: OK. So nothing referenced with respect to 21 the government's concerns about nullification would be 22 implicated in the anticipated opening? 23 MS. STERNHEIM: That is correct. 24 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00007089",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 38 of 127 LB15MAX2 38",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 THE COURT: From your perspective, anything further that could be addressed at this time or needs to be addressed? 2 MR. PAGLIUCA: On this topic your Honor? 3 THE COURT: Yes. 4 MR. PAGLIUCA: No. 5 THE COURT: Ms. Moe? 6 MS. MOE: No, your Honor. Thank you. 7 THE COURT: The next is government 9 which is to preclude evidence or argument sounding in nullification. I 8 agree with the defense that there is no need for me to rule on 9 this presently. I trust that defense counsel knows well the 10 clear rules around any such arguments so it is a bit hard to 11 think about what guidance I can offer here. 12 Ms. Moe, is there a specific concern you want to 13 raise? 14 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor. 15 Aside from the examples we proffered in our motion, 16 there is nothing in particular that this motion is aimed at and 17 so I don't think anything more along those lines to address 18 today. 19 MS. STERNHEIM: Nothing at this time. 20 THE COURT: OK. So nothing referenced with respect to 21 the government's concerns about nullification would be 22 implicated in the anticipated opening? 23 MS. STERNHEIM: That is correct.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007089",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. PAGLIUCA",
      "MS. MOE",
      "MS. STERNHEIM"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/15/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 465",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007089"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}