mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007147.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "96",
    "document_number": "465",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 96 of 127\nLB1TMAX3\n\n1 MR. PAGLIUCA: That's fine, your Honor.\n2 THE COURT: Respond in the same timeframe.\n3 MR. PAGLIUCA: Understood.\n4 THE COURT: Defendant's 8 is the search, the El Brillo Way search. The defendant seeks to prohibit the introduction of any items seized during an October 2000 search of Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence.\n5\n6\n7\n8 The defense raises concerns, including how and where the evidence was maintained, the lack of authenticating witnesses and the lack of relevance to the charges against Ms. Maxwell. Here, again, the government states that it intends to call witnesses to establish the authenticity of the evidence.\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14 So how do we take this up now, Ms. Moe?\n15 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. The government submits that at trial law enforcement witnesses will discuss the search and lay a foundation for the admission of this evidence.\n16\n17\n18 THE COURT: So as to authentication, you have witnesses that did exactly what with respect to the search?\n19 MS. MOE: They were personally involved in the search.\n20\n21 THE COURT: Okay. So they will describe the process by which they engaged in the search and the evidence that they obtained and how it was maintained and the like.\n22\n23\n24 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n25 THE COURT: And the relevance of the search result\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00007147",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 96 of 127",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LB1TMAX3",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MR. PAGLIUCA: That's fine, your Honor.\n2 THE COURT: Respond in the same timeframe.\n3 MR. PAGLIUCA: Understood.\n4 THE COURT: Defendant's 8 is the search, the El Brillo Way search. The defendant seeks to prohibit the introduction of any items seized during an October 2000 search of Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence.\n5\n6\n7\n8 The defense raises concerns, including how and where the evidence was maintained, the lack of authenticating witnesses and the lack of relevance to the charges against Ms. Maxwell. Here, again, the government states that it intends to call witnesses to establish the authenticity of the evidence.\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14 So how do we take this up now, Ms. Moe?\n15 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. The government submits that at trial law enforcement witnesses will discuss the search and lay a foundation for the admission of this evidence.\n16\n17\n18 THE COURT: So as to authentication, you have witnesses that did exactly what with respect to the search?\n19 MS. MOE: They were personally involved in the search.\n20\n21 THE COURT: Okay. So they will describe the process by which they engaged in the search and the evidence that they obtained and how it was maintained and the like.\n22\n23\n24 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n25 THE COURT: And the relevance of the search result",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007147",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. PAGLIUCA",
      "MS. MOE",
      "Jeffrey Epstein",
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Palm Beach"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "October 2000",
      "11/15/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 465",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007147"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}