mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007309.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "130",
    "document_number": "467",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 467 Filed 11/15/21 Page 130 of 158 130 LBAGmax4 Rocchio - Cross\n1 conclusion of the study, no.\n2 Q. Well, are you just saying you ignore the conclusion of the\n3 author who did this study because you don't agree with it?\n4 A. I'm not saying this is the conclusion. The purpose of the\n5 study -- a conclusion generally refers to the concluding\n6 comments summarizing the main findings of the study. So this\n7 is actually not part of her -- their conclusion. It's part of\n8 their rationale for why this particular piece of research is\n9 important and needed in the field.\n10 Q. So let's go through the methodology of this particular\n11 study as well.\n12 THE COURT: We'll take about a 20-minute, 30-minute\n13 break for lunch. It's 12:55, I think we probably need 30\n14 minutes, just logistically, so we'll resume at 1:25.\n15 I do want to encourage you, Mr. Pagliuca, to focus\n16 your cross less on what you might do in front of a jury --\n17 because you are ably demonstrating to me so far that the points\n18 you made in your papers are cross-examination points -- so to\n19 the extent there are any of the opinions you want to focus on\n20 the underlying Daubert questions -- and you did a little bit at\n21 the end here -- the time would be much more effectively used.\n22 MR. PAGLIUCA: Understood, your Honor.\n23 THE COURT: Thank you. We'll resume in 30 minutes.\n24 (Luncheon recess)\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00007309",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 467 Filed 11/15/21 Page 130 of 158 130 LBAGmax4 Rocchio - Cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 conclusion of the study, no.\n2 Q. Well, are you just saying you ignore the conclusion of the\n3 author who did this study because you don't agree with it?\n4 A. I'm not saying this is the conclusion. The purpose of the\n5 study -- a conclusion generally refers to the concluding\n6 comments summarizing the main findings of the study. So this\n7 is actually not part of her -- their conclusion. It's part of\n8 their rationale for why this particular piece of research is\n9 important and needed in the field.\n10 Q. So let's go through the methodology of this particular\n11 study as well.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "12 THE COURT: We'll take about a 20-minute, 30-minute\n13 break for lunch. It's 12:55, I think we probably need 30\n14 minutes, just logistically, so we'll resume at 1:25.\n15 I do want to encourage you, Mr. Pagliuca, to focus\n16 your cross less on what you might do in front of a jury --\n17 because you are ably demonstrating to me so far that the points\n18 you made in your papers are cross-examination points -- so to\n19 the extent there are any of the opinions you want to focus on\n20 the underlying Daubert questions -- and you did a little bit at\n21 the end here -- the time would be much more effectively used.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "22 MR. PAGLIUCA: Understood, your Honor.\n23 THE COURT: Thank you. We'll resume in 30 minutes.\n24 (Luncheon recess)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007309",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Pagliuca"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/15/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "467",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007309"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document is a court transcript with a clear structure and formatting. The text is mostly printed, with some indications of speaker roles (Q., A., THE COURT, MR. PAGLIUCA). The footer contains information about the reporting agency and a reference number."
}