| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "7",
- "document_number": "497",
- "date": "11/23/21",
- "document_type": "court document",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 497 Filed 11/23/21 Page 7 of 11\n1 As you know from experience, you can hear one person give his or her\n2 version of an event and think it sounds very impressive or even compelling, and\n3 yet, upon hearing another person's version of the same event — or even the same\n4 person cross-examined with respect to the event — things may seem very different.\n5 In other words, there may be another side to any witness's story.\n6 You should use your common sense and good judgment to evaluate each\n7 witness's testimony based on all of the circumstances. Again, I cannot emphasize\n8 too strongly that you must keep an open mind until the trial is over. You should\n9 not reach any conclusions until you have all the evidence before you.\n10 As I mentioned during jury selection, this case has received, and will\n11 continue to receive, significant attention in the media. To protect their privacy, I\n12 have permitted witnesses, if they choose, to be referred to in open court by either\n13 their first name or a pseudonym. The full names of the witnesses are known to the\n14 Government, the defendant, and to the Court, and were shown to you during jury\n15 selection. This process should not bear in any way on your evaluation of the\n16 evidence in this case.\n6\nDOJ-OGR-00007459",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 497 Filed 11/23/21 Page 7 of 11",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "1 As you know from experience, you can hear one person give his or her\n2 version of an event and think it sounds very impressive or even compelling, and\n3 yet, upon hearing another person's version of the same event — or even the same\n4 person cross-examined with respect to the event — things may seem very different.\n5 In other words, there may be another side to any witness's story.\n6 You should use your common sense and good judgment to evaluate each\n7 witness's testimony based on all of the circumstances. Again, I cannot emphasize\n8 too strongly that you must keep an open mind until the trial is over. You should\n9 not reach any conclusions until you have all the evidence before you.\n10 As I mentioned during jury selection, this case has received, and will\n11 continue to receive, significant attention in the media. To protect their privacy, I\n12 have permitted witnesses, if they choose, to be referred to in open court by either\n13 their first name or a pseudonym. The full names of the witnesses are known to the\n14 Government, the defendant, and to the Court, and were shown to you during jury\n15 selection. This process should not bear in any way on your evaluation of the\n16 evidence in this case.",
- "position": "main content"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "6",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007459",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Government",
- "defendant"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "Court",
- "Government"
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "11/23/21"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "497",
- "DOJ-OGR-00007459"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or jury instruction. The text is printed and clear, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
- }
|