DOJ-OGR-00007994.json 3.5 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "126",
  4. "document_number": "499-2",
  5. "date": "11/23/21",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 126 of 159125 LBAGmax4 Rocchio - Cross 1 Q. And that is explaining the experience from the point of view of the subject; right? 2 A. Yes. 3 Q. And then they talk about why they're doing this study and 4 it's to collect data to define a new term created by an 5 advocacy group. 6 7 Do you see that? 8 A. I'm sorry, could you repeat the question. 9 Q. Under method -- 10 A. Yes. 11 Q. -- it says that this study is this phenomenological study, 12 it's data collected as part of a statewide initiative to 13 understand predatory alienation -- a new term created by an 14 advocacy group. 15 Do you see that? 16 A. Yes. 17 Q. So that's what's being undertaken here, is this subjective 18 study to determine this term created by an advocacy group in 19 this study; right? 20 A. I wouldn't call it a subjective study. I'd call it a 21 qualitative study. But it's investigating the phenomenon of 22 predatory alienation, which it looks like was a term created by 23 an advocacy group. 24 Q. If you go down to the second part here, it says, \"All 25 experts identified as cisgender females between early 20s and SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00007994",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 126 of 159125",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "LBAGmax4 Rocchio - Cross",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "1 Q. And that is explaining the experience from the point of view of the subject; right? 2 A. Yes. 3 Q. And then they talk about why they're doing this study and 4 it's to collect data to define a new term created by an 5 advocacy group. 6 7 Do you see that? 8 A. I'm sorry, could you repeat the question. 9 Q. Under method -- 10 A. Yes. 11 Q. -- it says that this study is this phenomenological study, 12 it's data collected as part of a statewide initiative to 13 understand predatory alienation -- a new term created by an 14 advocacy group. 15 Do you see that? 16 A. Yes. 17 Q. So that's what's being undertaken here, is this subjective 18 study to determine this term created by an advocacy group in 19 this study; right? 20 A. I wouldn't call it a subjective study. I'd call it a 21 qualitative study. But it's investigating the phenomenon of 22 predatory alienation, which it looks like was a term created by 23 an advocacy group. 24 Q. If you go down to the second part here, it says, \"All 25 experts identified as cisgender females between early 20s and",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007994",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [],
  40. "organizations": [
  41. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  42. ],
  43. "locations": [],
  44. "dates": [
  45. "11/23/21"
  46. ],
  47. "reference_numbers": [
  48. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  49. "499-2",
  50. "DOJ-OGR-00007994"
  51. ]
  52. },
  53. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  54. }