DOJ-OGR-00009003.json 7.0 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "2",
  4. "document_number": "613",
  5. "date": "02/24/22",
  6. "document_type": "Table of Contents",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 2 of 66\n\nTable of Contents\n\nTable of Contents.......................................................................................................................ii\nTable of Authorities....................................................................................................................iv\nIntroduction ...............................................................................................................................1\nFactual Background....................................................................................................................2\nI. Jury Selection........................................................................................................................2\nA. The jury questionnaire....................................................................................................2\nB. Juror No. 50's questionnaire...........................................................................................5\nC. Juror No. 50's voir dire...................................................................................................6\nD. The final composition of the jury....................................................................................9\nII. Juror No. 50's admissions that he wasn't truthful with the Court..........................................11\nA. Juror No. 50's statements to the media..........................................................................12\n1. The interview with the Independent.........................................................................12\n2. The interview with the Daily Mail............................................................................13\n3. The interview with Reuters......................................................................................14\n4. The partial video of the interview with the Daily Mail.............................................14\nB. Juror No. 50's social media activity...............................................................................15\nC. A second juror admits to disclosing during deliberations that they were a victim of sexual assault...........................................................................................................................21\nApplicable Law.........................................................................................................................21\nI. Juror No. 50's misconduct deprived Ms. Maxwell of her constitutional right to a fair trial by an impartial jury................................................................................................................21\nA. A party alleging unfairness based on undisclosed juror bias must demonstrate first, that the juror's voir dire response was false and second, that the correct response would have provided a valid basis for a challenge for cause....................................................................21\nii\nDOJ-OGR-00009003",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 2 of 66",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "Table of Contents",
  20. "position": "top"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "Table of Contents.......................................................................................................................ii\nTable of Authorities....................................................................................................................iv\nIntroduction ...............................................................................................................................1\nFactual Background....................................................................................................................2\nI. Jury Selection........................................................................................................................2\nA. The jury questionnaire....................................................................................................2\nB. Juror No. 50's questionnaire...........................................................................................5\nC. Juror No. 50's voir dire...................................................................................................6\nD. The final composition of the jury....................................................................................9\nII. Juror No. 50's admissions that he wasn't truthful with the Court..........................................11\nA. Juror No. 50's statements to the media..........................................................................12\n1. The interview with the Independent.........................................................................12\n2. The interview with the Daily Mail............................................................................13\n3. The interview with Reuters......................................................................................14\n4. The partial video of the interview with the Daily Mail.............................................14\nB. Juror No. 50's social media activity...............................................................................15\nC. A second juror admits to disclosing during deliberations that they were a victim of sexual assault...........................................................................................................................21\nApplicable Law.........................................................................................................................21\nI. Juror No. 50's misconduct deprived Ms. Maxwell of her constitutional right to a fair trial by an impartial jury................................................................................................................21\nA. A party alleging unfairness based on undisclosed juror bias must demonstrate first, that the juror's voir dire response was false and second, that the correct response would have provided a valid basis for a challenge for cause....................................................................21",
  25. "position": "middle"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "ii",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009003",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "Ms. Maxwell"
  41. ],
  42. "organizations": [
  43. "Independent",
  44. "Daily Mail",
  45. "Reuters",
  46. "DOJ"
  47. ],
  48. "locations": [],
  49. "dates": [
  50. "02/24/22"
  51. ],
  52. "reference_numbers": [
  53. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  54. "613",
  55. "DOJ-OGR-00009003"
  56. ]
  57. },
  58. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a table of contents for a legal filing. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
  59. }