mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009192.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "616",
    "date": "02/24/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 616 Filed 02/24/22 Page 2 of 32\n\nTable of Contents\n\nTable of Contents ............................................................................................................................... ii\nTable of Authorities ....................................................................................................................... iii\nIntroduction .................................................................................................................................... 1\nThe Facts ......................................................................................................................................... 3\nThe Law ........................................................................................................................................... 6\nI. Ms. Maxwell is entitled to a new trial....................................................................................... 6\nA. The government's policy concerns-the abstract interest in \"finality\" and the so-called \"disfavor\" with which new trial motions are viewed-are misplaced. ............ 6\nB. Ms. Maxwell does not have to prove that Juror No. 50's voir dire answers were deliberately false............................................................................................................................... 9\nC. Juror No. 50's answers were deliberately false.................................................................... 14\nD. If Juror No. 50 had truthfully answered Questions 25 and 48, the correct responses would have provided a valid basis for a challenge for cause. ............................................................... 16\nE. This Court should reject the government's attempt to manufacture a \"Show Hearing\"... 19\n1. The lawyers should conduct the questioning.................................................................... 19\n2. The questioning should encompass any topic on which actual bias may be based.... 21\n3. The Additional Biased Juror Should Be Questioned........................................................... 23\n4. Ms. Maxwell is entitled to Discovery................................................................................... 24\n5. Juror No. 50 is not entitled to discovery in advance of the hearing. ............................... 25\nConclusion .................................................................................................................................... 25\nCertificate of Service .................................................................................................................... 27\nii\nDOJ-OGR-00009192",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 616 Filed 02/24/22 Page 2 of 32",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Table of Contents",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................... ii\nTable of Authorities ....................................................................................................................... iii\nIntroduction .................................................................................................................................... 1\nThe Facts ......................................................................................................................................... 3\nThe Law ........................................................................................................................................... 6\nI. Ms. Maxwell is entitled to a new trial....................................................................................... 6\nA. The government's policy concerns-the abstract interest in \"finality\" and the so-called \"disfavor\" with which new trial motions are viewed-are misplaced. ............ 6\nB. Ms. Maxwell does not have to prove that Juror No. 50's voir dire answers were deliberately false............................................................................................................................... 9\nC. Juror No. 50's answers were deliberately false.................................................................... 14\nD. If Juror No. 50 had truthfully answered Questions 25 and 48, the correct responses would Have Provided a valid basis for a challenge for cause. ............................................................... 16\nE. This Court should reject the government's attempt to manufacture a \"Show Hearing\"... 19\n1. The lawyers should conduct the questioning.................................................................... 19\n2. The questioning should encompass any topic on which actual bias may be based.... 21\n3. The Additional Biased Juror Should Be Questioned........................................................... 23\n4. Ms. Maxwell is entitled to Discovery................................................................................... 24\n5. Juror No. 50 is not entitled to discovery in advance of the hearing. ............................... 25\nConclusion .................................................................................................................................... 25\nCertificate of Service .................................................................................................................... 27",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "ii",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009192",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Juror No. 50"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "616",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009192"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Ms. Maxwell, with a table of contents outlining various sections and arguments. The document is well-formatted and free of significant damage or redactions."
}