mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009325.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "38",
    "document_number": "A-5721",
    "date": "08/24/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cv-10033-PAE Document 61-02 Filed 08/24/22 Page 38 of 130\nA-5721\n\nC2GFDAU1                        264\nBrune - direct\n1 A. Well, not necessarily all at once, but we certainly had\n2 resources and I certainly did not ask that more be done\n3 awaiting the answers from the prospective juror on voir dire.\n4 Q. And you could have told the Court at that point, correct?\n5 A. I certainly could have said to the Court that there is a\n6 Google search out there that reveals that there's a suspended\n7 lawyer by the name of Catherine Conrad.\n8 Q. And you didn't do that?\n9 A. I did not do that.\n10 Q. Now you appreciated, it sounds to me just from what you\n11 said, pretty instantly, that this is potentially significant\n12 information, correct?\n13 A. If it's the same person, it's very significant information.\n14 I certainly appreciated that.\n15 Q. No one -- you didn't require anyone to have to explain that\n16 to you, correct?\n17 A. No. I mean, we had a lot of Google-type information on a\n18 lot of jurors and, you know, it's a big metropolitan area.\n19 Some of that --\n20 Q. Ms. Brune, I asked you a very specific question.\n21 A. Can --\n22 Q. You did not require anybody else to explain to you the\n23 significance of that information. Is that true?\n24 A. If that's your question, the answer is no, I did not ask\n25 anyone to do any further research.\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00009325",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cv-10033-PAE Document 61-02 Filed 08/24/22 Page 38 of 130",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-5721",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2GFDAU1                        264\nBrune - direct",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 A. Well, not necessarily all at once, but we certainly had\n2 resources and I certainly did not ask that more be done\n3 awaiting the answers from the prospective juror on voir dire.\n4 Q. And you could have told the Court at that point, correct?\n5 A. I certainly could have said to the Court that there is a\n6 Google search out there that reveals that there's a suspended\n7 lawyer by the name of Catherine Conrad.\n8 Q. And you didn't do that?\n9 A. I did not do that.\n10 Q. Now you appreciated, it sounds to me just from what you\n11 said, pretty instantly, that this is potentially significant\n12 information, correct?\n13 A. If it's the same person, it's very significant information.\n14 I certainly appreciated that.\n15 Q. No one -- you didn't require anyone to have to explain that\n16 to you, correct?\n17 A. No. I mean, we had a lot of Google-type information on a\n18 lot of jurors and, you know, it's a big metropolitan area.\n19 Some of that --\n20 Q. Ms. Brune, I asked you a very specific question.\n21 A. Can --\n22 Q. You did not require anybody else to explain to you the\n23 significance of that information. Is that true?\n24 A. If that's your question, the answer is no, I did not ask\n25 anyone to do any further research.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009325",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Catherine Conrad",
      "Brune",
      "Ms. Brune"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 1:20-cv-10033-PAE",
      "Document 61-02",
      "A-5721",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009325"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}