mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009341.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "52",
    "document_number": "1616620",
    "date": "02/24/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616620 Filed 02/24/22 Page 52 of 130\nA-5737\n\nC2GFDAU1 Brune - direct 280\n1 Q. And as best as you can recall and with as much precision as\n2 you can muster, what exactly did Ms. Trzaskoma say to you as\n3 you were headed to 52 Duane?\n4 A. So the three of us were together and Ms. Trzaskoma said\n5 something to me along these lines: You know, I'm starting to\n6 wonder in light of the juror note whether this Juror No. 1\n7 could be the same person as this suspended lawyer.\n8 And Ms. Edelstein said, \"Well, what did she say in\n9 voir dire?\" And Theresa reminded us of the stay at home wife\n10 and the education and the other aspects of the voir dire and\n11 she reminded us that this person had some kind of a personal\n12 injury suit in the Bronx. And at that point, I think it was\n13 Ms. Edelstein, but I may have been the person who said it, one\n14 of us said well, that makes perfect sense. That explains why\n15 she's making references to these concepts. They must have been\n16 at issue in her case, and here I'm having a little bit of a\n17 hard time separating what I thought and what was said, but I\n18 either thought or said, well, you know, Judge Pauley will set\n19 her straight in the jury charge and, you know, it's sort of\n20 just a silly note.\n21 I thought that it all made sense because of the\n22 personal injury suit and that no lawyer would be so dumb as to\n23 think that vicarious liability or respondeat superior had any\n24 place in a criminal case.\n25 So then, so back to the conversation, and again I got\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00009341",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616620 Filed 02/24/22 Page 52 of 130",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-5737",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2GFDAU1 Brune - direct 280",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 Q. And as best as you can recall and with as much precision as\n2 you can muster, what exactly did Ms. Trzaskoma say to you as\n3 you were headed to 52 Duane?\n4 A. So the three of us were together and Ms. Trzaskoma said\n5 something to me along these lines: You know, I'm starting to\n6 wonder in light of the juror note whether this Juror No. 1\n7 could be the same person as this suspended lawyer.\n8 And Ms. Edelstein said, \"Well, what did she say in\n9 voir dire?\" And Theresa reminded us of the stay at home wife\n10 and the education and the other aspects of the voir dire and\n11 she reminded us that this person had some kind of a personal\n12 injury suit in the Bronx. And at that point, I think it was\n13 Ms. Edelstein, but I may have been the person who said it, one\n14 of us said well, that makes perfect sense. That explains why\n15 she's making references to these concepts. They must have been\n16 at issue in her case, and here I'm having a little bit of a\n17 hard time separating what I thought and what was said, but I\n18 either thought or said, well, you know, Judge Pauley will set\n19 her straight in the jury charge and, you know, it's sort of\n20 just a silly note.\n21 I thought that it all made sense because of the\n22 personal injury suit and that no lawyer would be so dumb as to\n23 think that vicarious liability or respondeat superior had any\n24 place in a criminal case.\n25 So then, so back to the conversation, and again I got",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009341",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Trzaskoma",
      "Ms. Edelstein",
      "Theresa",
      "Judge Pauley"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Bronx",
      "Duane"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "02/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00338-PAE",
      "1616620",
      "A-5737",
      "C2GFDAU1",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009341"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}