mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009497.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "78",
    "document_number": "6168/20",
    "date": "08/24/22",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00336-PAE Document 6168/20 Filed 08/24/22 Page 78 of 117\nA-5921\n\n19\n\nCAC3PARC\n1 of this after the receipt of the jury -- of Ms. Conrad's letter\n2 to the government in May after the verdict. And worse, even in\n3 the conference calls with the Court, they continued to make it\n4 appear and resist the Court and the government learning that\n5 knowledge.\n6 Mr. Shechtman seems to want to characterize this as\n7 them wanting to hide their mistakes. But it's quite clear, and\n8 Susan Brune and Laurie Edelstein testified, we would not have\n9 told this Court but for the Court pressing. That to me speaks\n10 of a decision made early on and continuing through the briefing\n11 that they wanted the juror on the panel, but they wanted the\n12 Court not to know exactly what they knew because they\n13 understood, and, as was acknowledged at the hearing, that that\n14 was damaging to their client.\n15 THE COURT: Would you address the prejudice prong.\n16 MS. DAVIS: Yes, your Honor. Your Honor, we believe\n17 that there is more than adequate evidence, indeed overwhelming\n18 evidence, of defendant Parse's criminal involvement in the\n19 corrupt endeavor to obstruct the IRS and in the mail fraud\n20 count. The defense conceded in its papers that Mr. Parse was\n21 involved in the backdated transactions. We think backdated\n22 transactions is a perfectly adequate description of them.\n23 We also submit, your Honor, that Mr. Parse's\n24 background as a CPA, even a non-practicing CPA, is under case\n25 law relevant to his intent and circumstantial evidence of his\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00009497",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00336-PAE Document 6168/20 Filed 08/24/22 Page 78 of 117",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-5921",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "19",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "CAC3PARC\n1 of this after the receipt of the jury -- of Ms. Conrad's letter\n2 to the government in May after the verdict. And worse, even in\n3 the conference calls with the Court, they continued to make it\n4 appear and resist the Court and the government learning that\n5 knowledge.\n6 Mr. Shechtman seems to want to characterize this as\n7 them wanting to hide their mistakes. But it's quite clear, and\n8 Susan Brune and Laurie Edelstein testified, we would not have\n9 told this Court but for the Court pressing. That to me speaks\n10 of a decision made early on and continuing through the briefing\n11 that they wanted the juror on the panel, but they wanted the\n12 Court not to know exactly what they knew because they\n13 understood, and, as was acknowledged at the hearing, that that\n14 was damaging to their client.\n15 THE COURT: Would you address the prejudice prong.\n16 MS. DAVIS: Yes, your Honor. Your Honor, we believe\n17 that there is more than adequate evidence, indeed overwhelming\n18 evidence, of defendant Parse's criminal involvement in the\n19 corrupt endeavor to obstruct the IRS and in the mail fraud\n20 count. The defense conceded in its papers that Mr. Parse was\n21 involved in the backdated transactions. We think backdated\n22 transactions is a perfectly adequate description of them.\n23 We also submit, your Honor, that Mr. Parse's\n24 background as a CPA, even a non-practicing CPA, is under case\n25 law relevant to his intent and circumstantial evidence of his",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009497",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Conrad",
      "Mr. Shechtman",
      "Susan Brune",
      "Laurie Edelstein",
      "MS. DAVIS",
      "Mr. Parse"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "IRS",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "May",
      "08/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00336-PAE",
      "6168/20",
      "A-5921",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009497"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}