mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010078.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "101",
    "document_number": "A-5795",
    "date": "2021-03-24",
    "document_type": "Deposition Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "C2GFDAU3 Edelstein 338\n1 to think of it, at one point we knew there was a suspended\n2 lawyer with the same name, and it was only at that point that I\n3 recalled any conversation I had had about the suspended lawyer,\n4 and I was sitting at my computer. I put the name Catherine\n5 Conrad into Google and I pulled up the Appellate Division\n6 orders.\n7 Q. Did you tell Randy Kim, by the way, that refreshes my\n8 recollection Theresa Trzaskoma told me the same thing on\n9 May 12th?\n10 A. Well, that's not exactly what Theresa had said, but I --\n11 Q. Did you say to him in substance that, yes, Theresa had told\n12 me something to that effect on May 12?\n13 A. No. I was -- I looked at the Google search and then opened\n14 up the Appellate Division order, I think the 2010 order, and\n15 that was the first time I had seen it.\n16 Q. And that led you to do what?\n17 A. So I then said, you know, I said, well, you know, here's a\n18 suspended lawyer with the name Catherine Conrad. I went to the\n19 New York State Bar Association registration site and put in the\n20 name Catherine Conrad and pulled up the registration\n21 information.\n22 Q. Which showed?\n23 A. Which showed an address in the Bronx and then it had a\n24 phone number, a 646 number and I looked at the letter and\n25 couldn't believe it but there was the Parkview Drive address in\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00010078",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2GFDAU3 Edelstein 338",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 to think of it, at one point we knew there was a suspended\n2 lawyer with the same name, and it was only at that point that I\n3 recalled any conversation I had had about the suspended lawyer,\n4 and I was sitting at my computer. I put the name Catherine\n5 Conrad into Google and I pulled up the Appellate Division\n6 orders.\n7 Q. Did you tell Randy Kim, by the way, that refreshes my\n8 recollection Theresa Trzaskoma told me the same thing on\n9 May 12th?\n10 A. Well, that's not exactly what Theresa had said, but I --\n11 Q. Did you say to him in substance that, yes, Theresa had told\n12 me something to that effect on May 12?\n13 A. No. I was -- I looked at the Google search and then opened\n14 up the Appellate Division order, I think the 2010 order, and\n15 that was the first time I had seen it.\n16 Q. And that led you to do what?\n17 A. So I then said, you know, I said, well, you know, here's a\n18 suspended lawyer with the name Catherine Conrad. I went to the\n19 New York State Bar Association registration site and put in the\n20 name Catherine Conrad and pulled up the registration\n21 information.\n22 Q. Which showed?\n23 A. Which showed an address in the Bronx and then it had a\n24 phone number, a 646 number and I looked at the letter and\n25 couldn't believe it but there was the Parkview Drive address in",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010078",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Randy Kim",
      "Theresa Trzaskoma",
      "Catherine Conrad"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "New York State Bar Association",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Bronx",
      "Parkview Drive"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "May 12",
      "2010",
      "2021-03-24"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "C2GFDAU3",
      "A-5795",
      "DOJ-OGR-00010078",
      "212-805-0300",
      "646"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a deposition transcript with clear and legible text. There are no visible redactions or damages."
}