mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011294.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "6",
    "document_number": "711",
    "date": "07/12/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 711 Filed 07/12/22 Page 6 of 11\n506:12 - 507:4 | 3509-0012, p. 2 | When Jane was 14 years old, she flew with Epstein and Maxwell to New York City to see The Lion King....The first time she traveled with them nothing inappropriate happened. | Objection. The witness agreed that this was her original statement to the Government. | Witness absolutely denied making the statement, or that it was accurate. Essential to prove she changed her story after suggestion by the government.\n512:11 - 513:7 | 3509-008, p. 6, 8th paragraph | Re first NM trip: She recalled going hiking. She remembered not doing too much and just sitting around mostly. | Objection. Not inconsistent with the witness's testimony. If it were, this is impeachment on a collateral fact. | Not collateral given that she was asked three times about abuse in NM and then changed her story.\n513:8 - 20 | 3509-008, p. 7, last full paragraph | She did not recall any specific abuse that occurred | Objection. Testimony about recalling \"any abuse\" is not inconsistent with prior statements that she does not recall \"specific abuse\" in New Mexico. | Not collateral given that she was asked three times about abuse in NM and then changed her story.\n514:2 - 11 | 3509-008, p. 7-8, overflow paragraph | Jane was asked if she recalled any specific abuse that occurred in New Mexico and stated she was not sure. | This is the same prior statement as the previous section | Not collateral given that she was asked three times about abuse in NM and then changed her story.\n514:1 - 515:7 | 3509-008, p. 8, 1st overflow paragraph | The place was dark and she did not recall many details of this location. If there was abuse that occurred, it wouldn't have been a group thing but she cannot recall anything specific. | This is the same paragraph as the prior section. To the extent the defendant wants to impeach Jane about whether any abuse that | Not collateral given that she was asked three times about abuse in NM and then changed her story...\n6\nDOJ-OGR-00011294",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 711 Filed 07/12/22 Page 6 of 11",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "506:12 - 507:4 | 3509-0012, p. 2 | When Jane was 14 years old, she flew with Epstein and Maxwell to New York City to see The Lion King....The first time she traveled with them nothing inappropriate happened. | Objection. The witness agreed that this was her original statement to the Government. | Witness absolutely denied making the statement, or that it was accurate. Essential to prove she changed her story after suggestion by the government.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "512:11 - 513:7 | 3509-008, p. 6, 8th paragraph | Re first NM trip: She recalled going hiking. She remembered not doing too much and just sitting around mostly. | Objection. Not inconsistent with the witness's testimony. If it were, this is impeachment on a collateral fact. | Not collateral given that she was asked three times about abuse in NM and then changed her story.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "513:8 - 20 | 3509-008, p. 7, last full paragraph | She did not recall any specific abuse that occurred | Objection. Testimony about recalling \"any abuse\" is not inconsistent with prior statements that she does not recall \"specific abuse\" in New Mexico. | Not collateral given that she was asked three times about abuse in NM and then changed her story.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "514:2 - 11 | 3509-008, p. 7-8, overflow paragraph | Jane was asked if she recalled any specific abuse that occurred in New Mexico and stated she was not sure. | This is the same prior statement as the previous section | Not collateral given that she was asked three times about abuse in NM and then changed her story.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "514:1 - 515:7 | 3509-008, p. 8, 1st overflow paragraph | The place was dark and she did not recall many details of this location. If there was abuse that occurred, it wouldn't have been a group thing but she cannot recall anything specific. | This is the same paragraph as the prior section. To the extent the defendant wants to impeach Jane about whether any abuse that | Not collateral given that she was asked three times about abuse in NM and then changed her story...",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "6",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00011294",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jane",
      "Epstein",
      "Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Government",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York City",
      "New Mexico"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "07/12/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "711",
      "3509-0012",
      "3509-008",
      "DOJ-OGR-00011294"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to a case involving Jane, Epstein, and Maxwell. The content discusses witness testimony and objections related to alleged abuse. The document is well-structured and printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps."
}